American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 123 pages of information about American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology.

American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 123 pages of information about American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology.

But it is in the structure of the pelvis and of the hind limb that some of these ancient reptiles present the most remarkable approximation to birds, and clearly indicate the way by which the most specialized and characteristic features of the bird may have been evolved from the corresponding parts in the reptile.

In Fig. 6, the pelvis and hind limbs of a crocodile, a three-toed bird, and an ornithoscelidan are represented side by side; and, for facility of comparison, in corresponding positions; but it must be recollected that, while the position of the bird’s limb is natural, that of the crocodile is not so.  In the bird, the thigh-bone lies close to the body, and the metatarsal bones of the foot (ii., iii., iv., Fig. 6) are, ordinarily, raised into a more or less vertical position; in the crocodile, the thigh-bone stands out at an angle from the body, and the metatarsal bones (i., ii., iii., iv., Fig. 6) lie flat on the ground.  Hence, in the crocodile, the body usually lies squat between the legs, while, in the bird, it is raised upon the hind legs, as upon pillars.

In the crocodile, the pelvis is obviously composed of three bones on each side:  the ilium (Il.), the pubis (Pb.), and the ischium (Is.).  In the adult bird there appears to be but one bone on each side.  The examination of the pelvis of a chick, however, shows that each half is made up of three bones, which answer to those which remain distinct throughout life, in the crocodile.  There is, therefore, a fundamental identity of plan in the construction of the pelvis of both bird and reptile; though the differences in form, relative size, and direction of the corresponding bones in the two cases are very great.

But the most striking contrast between the two lies in the bones of the leg and of that part of the foot termed the tarsus, which follows upon the leg.  In the crocodile, the fibula (F) is relatively large and its lower end is complete.  The tibia (T) has no marked crest at its upper end, and its lower end is narrow and not pulley-shaped.  There are two rows of separate tarsal bones (As., Ca., &c.) and four distinct metatarsal bones, with a rudiment of a fifth.

In the bird, the fibula is small and its lower end diminishes to a point.  The tibia has a strong crest at its upper end and its lower extremity passes into a broad pulley.  There seem at first to be no tarsal bones; and only one bone, divided at the end into three heads for the three toes which are attached to it, appears in the place of the metatarsus.

In a young bird, however, the pulley-shaped apparent end of the tibia is a distinct bone, which represents the bones marked As., Ca., in the crocodile; while the apparently single metatarsal bone consists of three bones, which early unite with one another and with an additional bone, which represents the lower row of bones in the tarsus of the crocodile.

In other words, it can be shown by the study of development that the bird’s pelvis and hind limb are simply extreme modifications of the same fundamental plan as that upon which these parts are modelled in reptiles.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.