Of course, He was a perfected human character inspired above all men by the spirit of God, showing the capacity of humanity to hold Divinity.  This is what Mary celebrates in her paean, “He that is mighty has magnified me and holy is his name.”  But is this what men have passionately adored in Jesus?  Has love of Him been self-love?  Is this why He has become the sanctuary of humanity?  I think not.  We have for the moment no good language for the other conception of Him.  He is indeed the pledge of what we may be, but how many of us would ever believe that pledge unless there was something else in Him, more than we, that guaranteed it?  What, as President Tucker asks, is this power which shall make “maybe” into “is” for us?  “Without doubt the trend of modern thought and faith is toward the more perfect identification of Christ with humanity.  We cannot overestimate the advantage to Christianity of this tendency.  The world must know and feel the humanity of Jesus.  But it makes the greatest difference in result whether the ground of the common humanity is in Him or in us.  To borrow the expressive language of Paul, was He ‘created’ in us?  Or are we ‘created’ in Him?  Grant the right of the affirmation that ’there is no difference in kind between the divine and the human’; allow the interchange of terms so that one may speak of the humanity of God and the divinity of man; appropriate the motive which lies in these attempts to bring God and man together and thus to explain the personality of Jesus Christ, it is still a matter of infinite concern whether His home is in the higher or the lower regions of divinity.  After all, very little is gained by the transfer of terms.  Humanity is in no way satisfied with its degree of divinity.  We are still as anxious as ever to rise above ourselves and in this anxiety we want to know concerning our great helper, whether He has in Himself anything more than the possible increase of a common humanity.  What is His power to lift and how long may it last?  Shall we ever reach His level, become as divine as He, or does He have part in the absolute and infinite?  This question may seem remote in result but it is everything in principle.  The immanence of Christ has its present meaning and value because of His transcendence."[40]

[Footnote 40:  “The Satisfaction of Humanity in Jesus Christ,” Andover Review, January, 1893.]

Preaching today is not moving on the level of this discussion, is neither asking nor attempting to answer its questions.  Great preaching in some way makes men see the end of the road, not merely the direction in which it travels.  The power to do that we have lost if we have lost the more-than-us in Jesus.  Humanity, unaided, cannot look to that end which shall explain the beginning.  And does Jesus mean very much to us if He is only “Jesus”?  Why do we answer the great invitation, “Come unto me”?  Because He is something other than us?  Because He calls us away from ourselves? back to home?  Most of us no longer know how to preach on that plane of experience or from the point of view where such questions are serious and real.  Our fathers had a world view and a philosophy which made such preaching easy.  But their power did not lie in that world view; it lay in this vision of Jesus which produced the view.  Is not this the vision which we need?