backward; for it is not pointed, like those of the
front toes, but is blunt. It is true that there
is a division of joints in the toes, which seems in
favor of the idea that they were those of Birds; for
when the three toes are turned forward, there are
two joints on the inner one, three on the middle,
and four on the outer one, as in Birds. But this
feature is not peculiar to Birds; it is found in Turtles
also. The correspondence of these footprints
with each other leaves no doubt that they were all
by one kind of animal; for both the bipedal and the
quadrupedal tracks have the same character. The
only quadrupedal animals now known to us which walk
on two legs are the Kangaroos. They raise themselves
on their hind legs, using the front ones to bring
their food to their mouth. They leap with the
hind legs, sometimes bringing down their front feet
to steady themselves after the spring, and making
use also of their tails, to balance the body after
leaping. In these tracks we find traces of a tail
between the feet. I do not bring this forward
as any evidence that these animals were allied to
Kangaroos, since I believe that nothing is more injurious
in science than assumptions which do not rest on a
broad basis of facts; but I wish only to show that
these tracks recall other animals besides Birds, with
which they have been universally associated. And
seeing, as we do, that so many of the early types prophesy
future forms, it seems not improbable that they may
have belonged to animals which combined with reptilian
characters some birdlike features, and also some features
of the earliest and lowest group of Mammalia, the Marsupials.
To sum up my opinion respecting these footmarks, I
believe that they were made by animals of a prophetic
type, belonging to the class of Reptiles, and exhibiting
many synthetic characters.
The more closely we study past creations, the more
impressive and significant do the synthetic types,
presenting features of the higher classes under the
guise of the lower ones, become. They hold the
promise of the future. As the opening overture
of an opera contains all the musical elements to be
therein developed, so this living prelude of the Creative
work comprises all the organic elements to be successively
developed in the course of time. When Cuvier first
saw the teeth of a Wealden Reptile, he pronounced
them to be those of a Rhinoceros, so mammalian were
they in their character. So, when Sommering first
saw the remains of a Jurassic Pterodactyl, he pronounced
them to be those of a Bird. These mistakes were
not due to a superficial judgment in men who knew
Nature so well, but to this prophetic character in
the early types themselves, in which features were
united never known to exist together in our days.
* * * *
*