“insolence and contempt of Parliament.”  But he complains that they were not so much regarded in England as he expected they would be, and that he was left to act on his own judgment.  He soon saw pilloried in the newspapers the names of a son of Governor Bernard and two of his own sons, in a list of Boston merchants who “audaciously counteracted the united sentiments of the body of merchants throughout North America by importing British goods contrary to agreement.”

The Lieutenant-Governor again kept quiet, as a town-meeting went on, which he watched with the keenest interest, freely commented on in his letters, and which is far too important to be overlooked in any review of these times.  William Bollan, the Colonial Agent in London, sent to the popular leaders a selection from the letters of Governor Bernard, General Gage, Commodore Hood, and others, bearing on the introduction of the troops, which were judged to have aspersed the character, affected the rights, and injured the interests of the town.  Their publication made a profound impression on the public mind, and they became the theme of every circle.  At one of the political clubs, in which the Adamses, the Coopers, Warren, and others were wont to discuss public affairs, Otis, in a blaze of indignation, charged the crown officials with haughtiness, arbitrary dispositions, and the insolence of office, and vehemently urged a town-meeting.  One was soon summoned by the Selectmen, which deliberated with dignity and order, and made answer to the official indictment in a strong, conclusive, and grand “Appeal to the World,” and appointed, as a committee to circulate it, Thomas Cushing, Samuel Adams, Joseph Warren, Richard Dana, Joshua Henshaw, Joseph Jackson, and Benjamin Kent,—­men of sterling character, and bearing names that have shed lustre on the whole country.  Reason and truth, thus put forth, exerted an influence.  Hutchinson felt the force of this.  “We find, my Lord, by experience,” he advised Lord Hillsborough, October 19, 1769, “that associations and assemblies pretending to be legal and constitutional, assuming powers that belong only to established authority, prove more fatal to this authority than mobs, riots, or the most tumultuous disorders; for such assemblies, from erroneous or imperfect notions of the nature of government, very often meet with the approbation of the body of the people, and in such case there is no internal power which can be exerted to suppress them.  Such case we are in at present, and shall probably continue in it until the wisdom of Parliament delivers us from it.”

It would be difficult to say what power the people now assumed that belonged only to established authority; they assumed only the right of public meeting and of liberty of discussion, which are unquestionable in every free country; but the ruling spirit of Hutchinson is seen in this fine tribute to the instrumentality of the town-meeting, for he regarded the American custom of corporate presentation of political matters as illegal, and the power of Parliament as sufficient to meet it with pains and penalties.  As the committee already named sent forth the doings of the town, they said, (October 23, 1769,) “The people will never think their grievances redressed till every revenue act is repealed, the Board of Commissioners dissolved, and the troops removed.”