“Now, you may all think that this was plain conversation; but I had read too much for that. In fact, it was logic—complate, convincing logic, every word of it. So I responded to him in what is called in the books, the argumentum ad crumenam; although I question but it ought to be designated here the argumentum ad bestiam. Said I, ’Father Finnerty, the colt, my paternal property, which you are pleased to eulogize so highly, is a good one; it was designed for myself when I should come out on the mission; however, I will undertake to say, if you get me into Maynooth, that my father, on my authority, will lend you the colt tomorrow, and the day of his claiming it will be dependent upon the fulfilment of your promise or votum.’
“‘Signatum et sigttlatum est,’ said he—for, indeed, the best part of the discussion was conducted in Latin; ‘and now,’ he continued, ’my excellent Dionysius, nothing remains but that the colt be presented—’
—“‘Lent,’ I responded, correcting him, ’you see, even although he was the priest—’lent,’ said I; ’and your Reverence will be good enough to give the votum before one or two of my friends.’
“He looked at me sharply, not expecting to find such deep logic in one he conjectured to be but a tyro.
“‘You will be a useful man in the church,’ he added, ’and you deserve to be pushed on at all events. In the meantime, tell your father that I’ll ride up and breakfast with him to-morrow, and he can have a friend or two to talk over the compactum.’
“So, father, there’s the state of the question at present; the accomplishment of the condition is dependent upon yourself.”