In your note you speak of observing some inelegancies of style.  I notice none.  All is as clear as daylight.  I have detected two or three errata.

In Vol.  I. you write lond_i_acus:  is this not an error?

Vol.  II., p. 236:  for western side of Aru read eastern.

Page 315:  Do you not mean the horns of the moose?  For the elk has not palmated horns.

I have only one criticism of a general nature, and I am not sure that other geologists would agree with me:  you repeatedly speak as if the pouring out of lava, etc., from volcanoes actually caused the subsidence of an adjoining area.  I quite agree that areas undergoing opposite movements are somehow connected; but volcanic outbursts must, I think, be looked at as mere accidents in the swelling tip of a great dome or surface of plutonic rocks; and there seems no more reason to conclude that such swelling or elevation in mass is the cause of the subsidence than that the subsidence is the cause of the elevation; which latter view is indeed held by some geologists, I have regretted to find so little about the habits of the many animals which you have seen.

In Vol.  II., p. 399, I wish I could see the connection between variations having been first or long ago selected, and their appearance at an earlier age in birds of paradise than the variations which have subsequently arisen and been selected.  In fact, I do not understand your explanation of the curious order of development of the ornaments of these birds.

Will you please to tell me whether you are sure that the female Casuarius (Vol.  II., p. 150) sits on her eggs as well as the male?—­for, if I am not mistaken, Bartlett told me that the male alone, who is less brightly coloured about the neck, sits on the eggs.  In Vol.  II., p. 255, you speak of male savages ornamenting themselves more than the women, of which I have heard before; now, have you any notion whether they do this to please themselves, or to excite the admiration of their fellow-men, or to please the women, or, as is perhaps probable, from all three motives?

Finally, let me congratulate you heartily on having written so excellent a book, full of thought on all sorts of subjects.  Once again, let me thank you for the very great honour which you have done me by your dedication.—­Believe me, my dear Wallace, yours very sincerely,

CH.  DARWIN.

Vol.  II., p. 455:  When in New Zealand I thought the inhabitants a mixed race, with the type of Tahiti preponderating over some darker race with more frizzled hair; and now that the stone instruments [have] revealed the existence of ancient inhabitants, is it not probable that these islands were inhabited by true Papuans?  Judging from descriptions the pure Tahitans must differ much from your Papuans.

* * * * *