CHAPTER VIII.

Statement of arguments which prove that
Jesus was not the messiah of the old testament.

Most of our readers have, no doubt, heard from the pulpit, many exclamations and declamations against the “blindness of the Jews,” in not recognizing their Messiah in Jesus of Nazareth.  The reasons of this “blindness” are made, I think, by this time pretty intelligible.

Nevertheless, for the further satisfaction of the reader, I will here set down the principal reasons given by Rabbi Isaac, in his “Munimen Fidei,” which cause the Jews to deny the Messiahship of Jesus.

“At a certain time, (says he,) a certain learned man of the wise men of the Christians said unto me:—­’Wherefore are you Jews unwilling to believe Jesus of Nazareth to be the Messiah, when yet your veritable prophets testified of him, whose words you profess to have faith in.’

“I gave him this answer.  ’How, I require, could we believe him to be the Messiah, when you can produce no genuine proof from the prophets in his favour, since all those things adduced by the evangelists from them, to prove Jesus the Messiah, are nothing to the purpose?  And we have many and evident reasons to prove that he was not the Messiah.  And of these, I will bring forward a few, arising, 1, From his genealogy. 2.  From his works. 3.  From the time of his appearing. 4.  From the prophecies of the things to take place in the time of the Messiah not having seen fulfilled in his age.  And in these things are contained the genuine marks characteristic of our Messiah.’

“1.  As to what concerns his genealogy; it does not prove this necessary thing, that Jesus was the son of David, because he was not begotten by Joseph, as the Gospel of Matthew testifies; for in the first chapter of it, it is written, that Jesus was born of Mary when she was yet a virgin, and had not been known by Joseph; which things being so, the genealogy of Joseph has nothing to do with Jesus.  The descent and origin of Mary, is still less known, but it seems from Luke’s calling Elizabeth, who was of Levi, her cousin, that Mary was of the tribe of Levi, and not of Judah, and, consequently, not of David; and, if she were, still Jesus is not the more the son of David; descents being reckoned from the males only.  Neither is the genealogy of Joseph rightly deduced from David, but labours under great difficulties.  Matthew, and Luke also, not only disagree, but irreconcilably and flatly contradict each other, in their genealogies of Joseph.  Now, it cannot be that the testimony of two witnesses, who directly contradict each other in the matter to be proved by them, can be received as true.  But the prophets have directed us to expect no Messiah but one born of the seed of David.