History of New England has given a graphic description of the event, which Mr. Sibley has also reproduced, in a note, and which will interest more readers than would ever have the privilege of reading either work.  I will therefore give the extract in full.  Speaking of Eaton and the pupil whom he punished, Winthrop says:  “The occasion was this:  He was a schoolmaster and had many scholars, the sons of gentlemen and others of best note in the country, and had entertained one Nathaniel Briscoe, a gentleman born, to be his usher, and to do some other things for him, which might not be unfit for a scholar.  He had not been with him above three days but he fell out with him for a very small occasion, and, with reproachful terms, discharged him, and turned him out of his doors; but, it being then about eight of the clock after the Sabbath, he told him he should stay till next morning, and, some words growing between them, he struck him and pulled him into his house.  Briscoe defended himself and closed with him, and, being parted, he came in and went up to his chamber to lodge there.  Mr. Eaton sent for the constable, who advised him first to admonish him, etc., and if he could not, by the power of a master, reform him, then he should complain to the magistrate.  But he caused his man to fetch him a cudgel, which was a walnut tree plant, big enough to have killed a horse, and a yard in length, and, taking his two men with him, he went up to Briscoe, and caused his men to hold him till he had given him two hundred stripes about the head and shoulders, etc., and so kept him under blows (with some two or three short intermissions) about the space of two hours, about which time Mr. Shepherd (the clergyman) and some others of the town came in at the outcry, and so he gave over.  In this distress Briscoe gate out his knife and struck at the man that held him, but hurt him not.  He also fell to prayer, (supposing he should have been murdered), and then Mr. Eaton beat him for taking the name of God in Vain.”

He was charged in open court with these cruelties to Briscoe, and it was there proved that he had been unusually cruel on other occasions, often punishing pupils with from twenty to thirty stripes, and never leaving them until they had confessed what he required.  He was also charged with furnishing a scant diet to his pupil boarders, keeping them on porridge and pudding, though their parents were paying for better fare.  He appears to have admitted the evil, butt threw the blame upon his wife.  The court found him guilty.  At first he denied his guilt.  He was put in care of a marshal for safe keeping, and, on the following day, the court was informed that he had repented in tears.  In the open court “he made a very solid, wise, eloquent, and serious (seeming) confession.”  The court was so much moved and pleased by this act of contrition that they only censured him and fined him twenty pounds and ordered the same amount to be paid to Briscoe.  The church intended to “deal with him,” but he fled to the Piscataqua settlements.  He was apprehended, and promised to return to Cambridge, but finally escaped and fled, on a boat, to Virginia.