In the home of today few fathers and mothers seem to realize the claim that the boy has upon them in the matter of comradeship.  The parent looks upon himself very largely in the light of the provider, and but very little attention is paid to the companionship call that is coming from the life of his boy.  After a strenuous day’s work the father is often physically incapacitated for such comradeship and only the strongest effort of will on his part can force him to recognize this fundamental need of his boy’s life.  It is just as necessary that the father should play with and be the companion of his boy as it is for him to see that he has good food, warm clothing, and a comfortable bed to sleep in.  The father generally is the boy’s hero up to a certain age.  This seems to be an unwritten, natural law of the boy’s life, and the father often forfeits this worship and respect of his boy by failing to afford him the natural companionship necessary to keep it alive.  In addition to a place and a voice in the councils of the family, it is necessary that the boy should have steady parental companionship to bring out the best that is in him.

The ownership of personal property and its recognition by the parent in the life of the boy is fundamental to the boy’s later understanding of the home and community life.  Comparatively few fathers and mothers ever recognize the deep call of the boy life to own things, and frequently the boy’s property is taken from him and he is deprived of its use as a means of punishment for some breach of home discipline.  In many families the boy grows up altogether without any adequate idea of what the right of private property really is, with the result that when he reaches the adolescent years and is swayed by the gang spirit, whatever comes in his way, as one of the gang, is appropriated by him to the gang use.  This means that the boy, because of his ignorance, becomes a ward of the Juvenile Court and a breaker of community laws.  The tendency, however, today in legal procedure is to hold the parents of such a boy liable for the offenses which may be committed.  Instead of talking about juvenile delinquency today we are beginning to comprehend the larger meaning of parental and community delinquency.  Out of nearly six hundred cases which came before the Juvenile Court in San Francisco last year only nineteen, by the testimony of the judge, were due to delinquency on the part of the offender himself.  The majority of the remaining cases were due to parental delinquency, or neglect of the father and mother.  A real part in the home life may be given to the boy by recognizing his individual and sole claim to certain things in the home life.