has the attendance been increased, but the enrollment
in the department has been doubled and trebled.
The department also presents an opportunity of interesting
boys in all forms of church life through the committee
work which the department inaugurates. The criticism
that the Boys’ Department may become a junior
church is not borne out by the experience of the men
who have tried it. On the other hand, the testimony
is that the Boys’ Department has increased the
attendance at the morning and evening services of
the church, and has created a general interest and
enthusiasm for the entire church life. The Boys’
Department is not urged on any basis of sex segregation,
although a good many educators are urging the segregation
of the sexes in public education. The underlying
idea of the Department is to group the boys together
for team work and cooperation, with a clear understanding
of the gang principle which clamors for a club or
organization that satisfies the social and fraternal
need. In fact, it is the neglect of the latter
by the Sunday school that has brought the countless
boys’ organizations into existence, and the
well-conducted Boys’ Department, composed of
well-organized, self-governing Bible classes, will
mean much to the general church life, as well as to
the simplifying of the present complicated scheme
of work with boys. Nearly all of these auxiliary
boy organizations have had their birth in the Sunday
school, through the attempt to meet the boy need,
which the Sunday school hitherto has not seen its
way clear to do.
When departmental organization, however, is mentioned,
the genius of the individual leader and teacher must
come into play. The form of organization that
may be successful with one leader may be a failure
with another. This chance does not lie or inhere
in the organization, but in the leader; for the gifts,
talents, equipment and adaptability of leaders vary
just as much in Sunday school organization as in the
so-called secular forms of activity. The best
form of organization, then, as well as the most successful
form for the local school, is the “kind that
works.”
Three Proved Forms of Departmental Organization
Successful organization is the result of experiment.
None but the result of experiment has a right to be
exploited. Sunday school teen age workers have
tried, proved and found satisfactory to their own liking,
by its results, the following three kinds of teen age
organization for the local school:
Intermediate and Senior Departments
The first of these is known as the Intermediate and
Senior Departmental organization. Its characteristic
is the dividing of the teen age into two groups—Intermediate,
13 to 16 years, and Senior, 17 to 20 years. In
some schools these departments meet separately for
Sunday school work. Wherever this is done there
should be at least a superintendent and secretary
for each. While the general principles of the