community, has been unaccountably neglected. The
subject is now receiving the earnest thought of the
best people of the city. Considerable difference
of opinion exists as to the best method of founding
and supporting such an institution. Some argue
that this should be done by the city alone, holding
that the self-respecting workingman and workingwoman
will never patronize a free library instituted solely
by private charity. Others urge that such an institution
to be successful should be free from city control
and entirely the result of private munificence.
The latter gentlemen have added to the cogency of
their arguments by a practical demonstration.
Early in 1880 they organized on a small scale a free
circulating library which should exist solely by the
benefactions of the public, with the object of furnishing
free reading at their homes to the people. The
general plan adopted was a central library, with branches
in the various wards, by this means bringing the centres
of distribution within easy reach of the city’s
homes. The success of the institution has been
such that its development should be carefully followed.
It began operations by leasing two rooms of the old
mansion, No. 36 Bond Street, and in March, 1880, “moved
in,” opening with a few hundred volumes donated
chiefly from the libraries of its projectors.
The first month—March—1044 volumes
were circulated. By October this had grown to
4212. The next year—1881-82—the
circulation reached 69,280, and it continued to increase
until in 1883 it reached 81,233,—an increase
of nearly 10,000 over the preceding year. In May,
1883, the library was removed to the comfortable and
roomy building, No. 49 Bond Street, which had been
purchased and fitted up for it by the trustees.
Early in December, 1884, the Ottendorfer Library, at
135 Second Avenue, the first of the projected branch
libraries, was opened with 8819 volumes, 4784 of which
were in English and 4035 in German, the whole, with
the library building, being the gift of Mr. Oswald
Ottendorfer, of New York. The branch proved equally
popular, having circulated during the past year—1885—97,000
volumes, while the circulation of the main library
has increased to 104,000 volumes, the combined circulation
of both libraries exceeding that of any other in the
city. The percentage of loss has been only one
book for 31,768 circulated. The report of the
treasurer shows that the annual expenses of the library—about
twelve thousand dollars—have been met by
voluntary contributions, and that it has a permanent
fund of about thirty-two thousand dollars besides
its books. These figures prove that libraries
of this character will be appreciated, and used by
the people. The library committee say, in their
last report, that after four years’ experience
they feel competent to begin the establishment of branch
libraries, and observe that at least six of these centres
of light and intelligence should be opened in various
quarters of the city. It is understood that lack
of funds alone prevents the institution from entering
on this wider field. When one considers the liberal
and too often indiscriminate charities of the metropolis,
and reflects that the need and utility of this excellent
enterprise have been demonstrated, it seems impossible
that pecuniary obstacles will long be allowed to stand
in the way of its legitimate development.