an echo; there was no deep to answer to his deep.
G. repeatedly begged him to be quiet. The third
act at length brought on the scene which was to warm
the piece progressively to the final flaming forth
of the catastrophe. A philosophic calm settled
upon the clear brow of G., as it approached.
The lips of M. quivered. A challenge was held
forth upon the stage, and there was promise of a fight.
The pit roused themselves on this extraordinary occasion,
and, as their manner is, seemed disposed to make a
ring,—when suddenly Antonio, who was the
challenged, turning the tables upon the hot challenger,
Don Gusman, (who, by the way, should have had his
sister,) balks his humor, and the pit’s reasonable
expectation at the same time, with some speeches out
of the new philosophy against duelling. The audience
were here fairly caught,—their courage
was up, and on the alert,—a few blows,
ding
dong, as R——s the dramatist afterwards
expressed it to me, might have done the business,—when
their most exquisite moral sense was suddenly called
in to assist in the mortifying negation of their own
pleasure. They could not applaud, for disappointment;
they would not condemn, for morality’s sake.
The interest stood stone-still; and John’s manner
was not at all calculated to unpetrify it. It
was Christmas time, and the atmosphere furnished some
pretext for asthmatic affections. One began to
cough, his neighbor sympathized with him, till a cough
became epidemical. But when, from being half
artificial in the pit, the cough got frightfully naturalized
among the fictitious persons of the drama, and Antonio
himself (albeit it was not set down in the stage-directions)
seemed more intent upon relieving his own lungs than
the distresses of the author and his friends,—then
G. ‘first knew fear,’ and, mildly turning
to M., intimated that he had not been aware that Mr.
Kemble labored under a cold, and that the performance
might possibly have been postponed with advantage
for some nights further,—still keeping the
same serene countenance, while M. sweat like a bull.
“It would be invidious to pursue the fates of
this ill-starred evening. In vain did the plot
thicken in the scenes that followed, in vain the dialogue
wax more passionate and stirring, and the progress
of the sentiment point more and more clearly to the
arduous development which impended. In vain the
action was accelerated, while the acting stood still.
From the beginning, John had taken his stand,—had
wound himself up to an even tenor of stately declamation,
from which no exigence of dialogue or person could
make him swerve for an instant. To dream of his
rising with the scene (the common trick of tragedians)
was preposterous; for from the onset he had planted
himself, as upon a terrace, on an eminence vastly
above the audience, and he kept that sublime level
to the end. He looked from his throne of elevated
sentiment upon the under-world of spectators with
a most sovran and becoming contempt. There was