him everywhere.  But now this Man stretches His hand across the dreary gulf, and lets him feel once more the sweetness of a warm and gentle touch.  It was half the cure; it was the complete clearing away of the last film of the cloud of doubt as to the will of Jesus.  It answered the ‘if’ by something that spoke louder than any word.  And, though it was not meant for anything but the silent voice of pity and love, we do not rob it of its beautiful spontaneity when we see, in the touch of that pure hand on the rotting feculence of leprosy, a parable of the Incarnation, in which He lays hold on our flesh of sin and is yet without sin—­contracts no defilement by contact, but by touching cleanses the foulness on which He lays His white fingers.  By that touch He proclaimed Himself the priest, to whom the Law gave the office of laying his hand on the leper.

But the great word accompanying the touch is majestic in its brevity and absolute claim to absolute power.  Jesus accepts the leper’s lofty conception of His omnipotent will, as He always accepted the highest conceptions that any formed of His person or authority.  The sovereign utterance, ‘I will,’ claims possession of the divine prerogative of affecting dead matter by the mere outgoing of His volition.  Not only is it true of Him that ‘He spake and it was done,’ but He willed and it was done; and these are the hall-marks of divine power.  Neither the touch of His hand nor the word of His lips cleansed the leper, but simply the exercise of His will, of which word and touch were but audible and visible tokens for sense to grasp.  The form of the poor husky croak for help determined the form of the answer, and the correspondence is marked by all the evangelists as a striking instance of Christ’s loving way of echoing our petitions in His replies, and moulding His gifts to match our desires.  Thunder in heaven wakes echoes on earth, but more wonderful is it that the thin voice of our supplications, when we scarcely dare to shape them into prayers, should wake a voice from the throne, which, though it is mighty as ‘the voice of many waters’ and sweet as that of ‘harpers harping with their harps,’ deigns to echo our poor cries.

The prohibition to speak of the cure till the priests had pronounced it real and complete is more stringent in Mark, who also tells how utterly it was disregarded.  Its reason was obviously the wish to comply with the law, and also the wish to get the official seal to the cure.  Jesus did desire the miracle to be known, but not till it was authoritatively certified by the priest whose business it was to pronounce a sufferer clean.  It was for the leper’s advantage, too, that he should have the official certificate, since he would not be restored to society without it.  One does not wonder that the prohibition was disregarded in the uncontrollable delight and wonder at such an experience.  The leper was eloquent, as we all can be, when our hearts are engaged, and his blessing refused to be hid.  Alas, how many of us, who profess to have been cleansed from a worse defilement, find no such impulse to speak welling up in ourselves!  Alas, how superfluous is the injunction to hundreds of Christ’s disciples:  ‘See thou say nothing to any man’!