This Gospel of Matthew is emphatically the gospel of the Kingdom.  It sets forth Jesus as the long-promised Messiah, the Son of David.  And this conception of Him and of His work, whilst it runs through the whole of the Gospel, is more obviously influential in shaping the selection of incidents and colouring the cast of the language, in the early portion.  Hence the genealogy with which the Gospel begins dwells with emphasis on His royal descent from David.  Hence the story of the wise men of the East is given, who came to do their homage to the new-born King of the Jews, whose innocent poverty and infancy are set in contrast with the court and character of the cruel Herod who had for an hour usurped the title.  Hence, also, the mission of John the Baptist is all summed up in his proclamation:  ‘The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.’  He is the herald that runs before the chariot of the advancing Monarch, and shouts to a slumbering nation, ‘The King! the King!’

Preserving the same reference to the royal dignity of Jesus, we may look at His baptism as being His public assumption of His Messianic office, and at this descent of the Holy Spirit as the anointing or coronation of the King.  As His meek head rose, glistening from the waters of the baptism, there fluttered down upon Him the gentle token of the manifest designation from the Heavens, which solemnly declared Him to be the Son of God, anointed Messias, King of Israel and of the world.

So in looking at this incident, I take simply two points of view, and consider its bearing on Jesus, and on us.

I. As to the former, we have here the Coronation of the King.

We need not spend time upon the question which we have no materials for answering, viz.—­What was the ‘objective material reality’ here?  We do not know enough about what constitutes ‘objective material reality,’ nor about what are the laws of prophetic ecstasy and vision, to discuss such a question as that.  Nor is there any need to moot it.  It does not matter one rush whether bystanders would have seen anything or not.  It does not matter in the least whether there was any actual excitation of auditory or visual nerves.  It does not matter whether there was anything which people are contented to call material—­a word which covers a depth of ignorance.  Enough for us that this was no fancy, born in a man’s brain, but an actual manifestation, whether through sense or apart from sense, to consciousness, of a divine outpouring and communication.  Enough for us that the voice which spoke was God’s, and that that which descended was the Spirit of God.  As to all other questions, they may be amusing and interesting, but they are insoluble, and therefore unimportant.