seemed most needed. And, besides, the use of
the State police force beyond the limits of a county
for the protection of Justice Field would have been
impracticable, as the powers of the sheriff would
have ended at its borders, and of other township and
city peace officers at the boundaries of their respective
townships and cities. Only a United States marshal
or his deputy could have exercised these official
functions throughout the judicial district, which
embraces many counties. The only remedy suggested
on the part of the State was to arrest the deceased
and hold him to bail to keep the peace under section
706 of the Penal Code, the highest limit of the amount
of bail being $5,000. But although the threats
are conceded to have been publicly known in the State,
no State officer took any means to provide this flimsy
safeguard. And the execution of a bond in this
amount to keep the peace would have had no effect in
deterring the intended assailants from the, commission
of the offense contemplated, when the penalties of
the law would not deter them.
As to the deliberation and wisdom of Neagle’s conduct under the circumstances, the court, after stating the established facts, concludes as follows:
“When the deceased left his seat, some thirty feet distant, walked stealthily down the passage in the rear of Justice Field and dealt the unsuspecting jurist two preliminary blows, doubtless by way of reminding him that the time for vengeance had at last come, Justice Field was already at the traditional ‘wall’ of the law. He was sitting quietly at a table, back to the assailant, eating his breakfast, the side opposite being occupied by other passengers, some of whom were women, similarly engaged. When, in a dazed condition, he awoke to the reality of the situation and saw the stalwart form of the deceased with arm drawn back for a final mortal blow, there was no time to get under or over the table, had the law, under any circumstances, required such an act for his justification. Neagle could not seek a ‘wall’ to justify his acts without abandoning his charge to certain death. When, therefore, he sprang to his feet and cried, ‘Stop! I am an officer,’ and saw the powerful arm of the deceased drawn back for the final deadly stroke instantly change its direction to his left breast, apparently seeking his favorite weapon, the knife, and at the same time heard the half-suppressed, disappointed growl of recognition of the man who, with the aid of half a dozen others, had finally succeeded in disarming him of his knife at the court-room a year before, the supreme moment had come, or, at least, with abundant reason he thought so, and fired the fatal shot. The testimony all concurs in showing this to be the state of facts, and the almost universal consensus of public opinion of the United States seems to justify the act. On that occasion a second, or two seconds, signified, at least, two valuable lives, and a reasonable