’Hoped that such an important and serious proposition would not be hastily adopted.  It was rather a late moment for the first introduction of a subject so big with serious consequences.  No one topic had been yet introduced so important to South Carolina and the welfare of the Union.”

Mr. Sherman got the floor, and said he

“Approved the object of the motion, but did not think it a fit subject to be embraced in this bill.  He could not reconcile himself to the insertion of human beings, as a subject of impost, among goods, wares, and merchandise.  He hoped the motion would be withdrawn for the present, and taken up afterwards as an independent subject.”

Mr. Jackson of Georgia

“Was not surprised, however others might be so, at the quarter whence this motion came.  Virginia, as an old settled State, had her complement of slaves, and the natural increase being sufficient for her purpose, she was careless of recruiting her numbers by importation.  But gentlemen ought to let their neighbors get supplied before they imposed such a burden.  He knew this business was viewed in an odious light at the Eastward, because the people there were capable of doing their own work, and had no occasion for slaves.  But gentlemen ought to have some feeling for others.  Surely they do not mean to tax us for every comfort and enjoyment of life, and, at the same time, to take from us the means of procuring them!  He was sure, from the unsuitableness of the motion to the business now before the house, and the want of time to consider it, the gentleman’s candor would induce him to withdraw it.  Should it ever be brought forward again, he hoped it would comprehend the white slaves as well as the black, imported from all the jails of Europe; wretches convicted of the most flagrant crimes, who were brought in and sold without any duty whatever.  They ought to be taxed equally with Africans, and he had no doubt of the equal constitutionality and propriety of such a course.”

Mr. Parker of Virginia obtained the floor again, and proceeded to reply to the remarks offered upon his amendment by Sherman, Jackson, and Smith.  He declared,—­

“That, having introduced the motion on mature reflection, he did not like to withdraw it.  The gentleman from Connecticut had said that human beings ought not to be enumerated with goods, wares, and merchandise.  Yet he believed they were looked upon by African traders in that light.  He hoped Congress would do all in their power to restore to human nature its inherent privileges; to wipe off, if possible, the stigma under which America labored; to do away with the inconsistence in our principles justly charged upon us; and to show, by our actions, the pure beneficence of the doctrine held out to the world in our Declaration of Independence.”

Mr. Ames of Massachusetts

     “Detested slavery from his soul; but he had some doubts
     whether imposing a duty on their importation would not have
     an appearance of countenancing the practice.”