That was all.  Not a cent of appropriation asked for.  The market opened August 10, 1917, with fifty farm wagons in place.  Before the summer was over it was common to find more than 100 at their stands.  The local war-garden supervisor acted as inspector.  He looked over the produce, advised the farmers how to pack and display it, and used every energy in the direction of popularizing the market among producers and consumers alike.

Between Manager Peet and the inspector a scheme was worked out whereby every Thursday was bargain day in market.  They would get a certain number of farmers to agree to pack and offer for sale on those days a limited number of baskets of their finest tomatoes, say.  Or it might be corn.  In the case of tomatoes the bargain price would be ten cents for baskets which that day were selling regularly for eighteen to twenty-five cents.  To each of these baskets—­no farmer was asked to sacrifice more than ten—­was attached a green tag noting that it was a bargain.

Each bargain day was advertised in advance among Lockport consumers.  Thursday mornings would see an early rush to the market.  The bargains would be cleaned out and then business at normal prices would continue at a brisker rate than usual.

The first year of its operation this market was held on fifty-one days.  During this period 1300 rigs sold out their produce for a total of $13,000.  This simple move has resulted in stabilizing prices in Lockport and has encouraged the bringing in of farm produce.  Prices automatically regulate themselves.  If they begin to get too low in Lockport, the supply in sight is immediately reduced through action by the producers in shipping the stuff to Niagara Falls or Buffalo by motor trucks.

The distribution of Lockport’s milk supply, as happens in hundreds of cities, has been attended by considerable waste and expense as a result of duplication of delivery routes, breakage of bottles and uneconomic schedules.

The first night I was in Lockport, Manager Peet was holding a meeting of the milk producers supplying the city for the purpose of settling this inequity once and for all.  A little agitation had been carried on ahead of this meeting, but only a little.  Peet had a plan.

“It’s all wrong to plan for a municipally owned central distributing system,” he was explaining to me the next morning; “these are too likely to get mixed up in politics.  So last night we just about clinched our arrangement for having our city distributing system owned by the producers themselves.  In the past we have had eight distributors with fifteen wagons handling the milk supplied from fifty dairy farms.  There has been a big loss in time and money as a result of this competition.

“The farm bureau got the producers together on the plan of securing options on these distributors’ interests, and last night we just about wound up all the preliminaries.  We already have our limited liability corporation papers.  We’re incorporating under the Membership Corporation Law.  Our organization comes under the amendment to the Sherman Antitrust Law, you know, following closely the California law under which the California fruit growers’ associations operate.