4. What other methods might have been
used to advantage in
presenting this subject?
5. Is the article predominantly narrative, descriptive, or expository?
6. To what extent are narration and description
used for expository
purposes?
7. Are concrete examples and specific
instances employed
effectively?
8. By what means are the narrative passages made interesting?
9. Do the descriptive parts of the article
portray the impressions
vividly?
V. STRUCTURE
1. What main topics are taken up in the article?
2. Could any parts of the article be omitted
without serious
loss?
3. Could the parts be rearranged with
gain in clearness, interest,
or progress?
4. Does the article march on steadily from beginning to end?
5. Is the material so arranged that the
average reader will
reach the conclusion
that the writer intended to have him reach?
6. Is there variety in the methods of presentation?
7. Is the length of the article proportionate to the subject?
8. What type of beginning is used?
9. Is the type of beginning well adapted
to the subject and the
material?
10. Would the beginning attract the attention
and hold the interest
of the average reader?
11. Is the beginning an integral part of the article?
12. Is the length of the beginning proportionate
to the length of
the whole article?
13. Is the beginning skillfully connected with the body of the article?
VI. STYLE
1. Is the article easy to read? Why?
2. Is the diction literary or colloquial,
specific or general, original
or trite, connotative
or denotative?
3. Are figures of speech used effectively?
4. Do the sentences yield their meaning easily when read rapidly?
5. Is there variety in sentence length and structure?
6. Are important ideas placed at the beginning of sentences?
7. Are the paragraphs long or short?
8. Are they well-organized units?
9. Do the paragraphs begin with important ideas?
10. Is there variety in paragraph beginnings?
11. Is the tone well suited to the subject?
12. Do the words, figures of speech, sentences,
and paragraphs
in this article suggest
to you possible means of improving
your own style?
VII. TITLES AND HEADLINES
1. Is the title attractive, accurate, concise, and concrete?
2. To what type does it conform?
3. What is the character of the sub-title,
and what relation
does it bear to the
title?