HOW MANUSCRIPTS ARE HANDLED. In order to handle hundreds of manuscripts as expeditiously as possible, most large editorial offices have worked out systems that, though differing slightly, are essentially the same.  When a manuscript is received, a record is made of it on a card or in a book, with the name and address of the author, the title and character of the contribution, and the time of its receipt.  The same data are entered on a blank that is attached to the manuscript by a clip.  On this blank are left spaces for comments by each of the editorial assistants who read and pass upon the article.

After these records have been made, the manuscript is given to the first editorial reader.  He can determine by glancing at the first page or two whether or not the article is worth further consideration.  Of the thousands of contributions of all kinds submitted, a considerable proportion are not in the least adapted to the periodical to which they have been sent.  The first reader, accordingly, is scarcely more than a skilled sorter who separates the possible from the impossible.  All manuscripts that are clearly unacceptable are turned over to a clerk to be returned with a rejection slip.

When an article appears to have merit, the first reader looks over it a second time and adds a brief comment, which he signs with his initials.  The manuscript is then read and commented on by other editorial readers before it reaches the assistant editor.  The best of the contributions are submitted to the editor for a final decision.  By such a system every meritorious contribution is considered carefully by several critics before it is finally accepted or rejected.  Moreover, the editor and the assistant editor have before them the comments of several readers with which to compare their own impressions.

In newspaper offices manuscripts are usually sorted by the assistant Sunday editor, or assistant magazine editor, and are finally accepted or rejected by the Sunday or magazine editor.

REJECTED MANUSCRIPTS.  In rejecting contributions, editorial offices follow various methods.  The commonest one is to send the author a printed slip expressing regret that the manuscript is not acceptable and encouraging him to submit something else.  Some ingenious editors have prepared a number of form letters to explain to contributors the various reasons why their manuscripts are unacceptable.  The editorial assistant who rejects an unsuitable article indicates by number which of these form letters is to be sent to the author.  A few editors send a personal letter to every contributor.  Sometimes an editor in rejecting a contribution will suggest some publication to which it might be acceptable.  If a manuscript has merit but is not entirely satisfactory, he may suggest that it be revised and submitted to him again.

KEEPING A MANUSCRIPT RECORD.  Every writer who intends to carry on his work in a systematic manner should keep a manuscript record, to assist him in marketing his articles to the best advantage.  Either a book or a card index may be used.  The purpose of such a record is to show (1) the length of time required by various publications to make a decision on contributions; (2) the rate and the time of payment of each periodical; (3) the present whereabouts of his manuscript and the periodicals to which it has already been submitted.