can be little danger from a strong attachment to particular
tenets in faith. This I am perfectly sure is your
case; but I am not equally sure that either zeal for
the tenets of faith, or the smallest degree of charity
or justice, have much influenced the gentlemen who,
under pretexts of zeal, have resisted the enfranchisement
of their country. My dear son, who was a person
of discernment, as well as clear and acute in his
expressions, said, in a letter of his which I have
seen, “that, in order to grace their cause, and
to draw some respect to their persons, they pretend
to be bigots.” But here, I take it, we
have not much to do with the theological tenets on
the one side of the question or the other. The
point itself is practically decided. That religion
is owned by the state. Except in a settled maintenance,
it is protected. A great deal of the rubbish,
which, as a nuisance, long obstructed the way, is
removed. One impediment remained longer, as a
matter to justify the proscription of the body of our
country; after the rest had been abandoned as untenable
ground. But the business of the Pope (that mixed
person of polities and religion) has long ceased to
be a bugbear: for some time past he has ceased
to be even a colorable pretext. This was well
known, when the Catholics of these kingdoms, for our
amusement, were obliged on oath to disclaim him in
his political capacity,—which implied an
allowance for them to recognize him in some sort of
ecclesiastical superiority. It was a compromise
of the old dispute.
For my part, I confess I wish that we had been less
eager in this point. I don’t think, indeed,
that much mischief will happen from it, if things
are otherwise properly managed. Too nice an inquisition
ought not to be made into opinions that are dying
away of themselves. Had we lived an hundred and
fifty years ago, I should have been as earnest and
anxious as anybody for this sort of abjuration; but,
living at the time in which I live, and obliged to
speculate forward instead of backward, I must fairly
say, I could well endure the existence of every sort
of collateral aid which opinion might, in the now
state of things, afford to authority. I must
see much more danger than in my life I have seen,
or than others will venture seriously to affirm that
they see, in the Pope aforesaid, (though a foreign
power, and with his long tail of et ceteras,)
before I should be active in weakening any hold which
government might think it prudent to resort to, in
the management of that large part of the king’s
subjects. I do not choose to direct all my precautions
to the part where the danger does not press, and to
leave myself open and unguarded where I am not only
really, but visibly attacked.