than formerly it had been. As to Prussia, a merely
military power, they observed that one war had enriched
her with as considerable a conquest as France had
acquired in centuries. Russia had broken the
Turkish power, by which Austria might be, as formerly
she had been, balanced in favor of France. They
felt it with pain, that the two Northern powers of
Sweden and Denmark were in general under the sway
of Russia,—or that, at best, France kept
up a very doubtful conflict, with many fluctuations
of fortune, and at an enormous expense, in Sweden.
In Holland the French party seemed, if not extinguished,
at least utterly obscured, and kept under by a Stadtholder,
leaning for support sometimes on Great Britain, sometimes
on Prussia, sometimes on both, never on France.
Even the spreading of the Bourbon family had become
merely a family accommodation, and had little effect
oh the national politics. This alliance, they
said, extinguished Spain by destroying all its energy,
without adding anything to the real power of France
in the accession of the forces of its great rival.
In Italy the same family accommodation, the same national
insignificance, were equally visible. What cure
for the radical weakness of the French monarchy, to
which all the means which wit could devise, or Nature
and fortune could bestow, towards universal empire,
was not of force to give life or vigor or consistency,
but in a republic? Out the word came: and
it never went back.
Whether they reasoned right or wrong, or that there
was some mixture of right and wrong in their reasoning,
I am sure that in this manner they felt and reasoned.
The different effects of a great military and ambitious
republic and of a monarchy of the same description
were constantly in their mouths. The principle
was ready to operate, when opportunities should offer,
which few of them, indeed, foresaw in the extent in
which they were afterwards presented; but these opportunities,
in some degree or other, they all ardently wished for.
When I was in Paris in 1773, the treaty of 1756 between
Austria and France was deplored as a national, calamity;
because it united France in friendship with a power
at whose expense alone they could hope any Continental
aggrandizement. When the first partition of Poland
was made, in which France had no share, and which
had farther aggrandized every one of the three powers
of which they were most jealous, I found them in a
perfect frenzy of rage and indignation: not that
they were hurt at the shocking and uncolored violence
and injustice of that partition, but at the debility,
improvidence, and want of activity in their government,
in not preventing it as a means of aggrandizement
to their rivals, or in not contriving, by exchanges
of some kind or other, to obtain their share of advantage
from that robbery.