“Had Mr. Fox fallen into the snare, his speech on the occasion would have been laid before a great personage, as a proof that a man who could defend such a revolution might be a very good republican, but could not possibly be a friend to monarchy.

“But those who laid the snare were disappointed; for Mr. Fox, in the short conversation which took place yesterday in the House of Commons, said, that he confessedly had thought favorably of the French Revolution, but that most certainly he never had, either in Parliament or out of Parliament, professed or defended republican principles.”—­Argus, April 22d, 1791.

Mr. Burke cannot answer for the truth nor prove the falsehood of the story given by the friends of the party in this paper.  He only knows that an opinion of its being well or ill authenticated had no influence on his conduct.  He meant only, to the best of his power, to guard the public against the ill designs of factions out of doors.  What Mr. Burke did in Parliament could hardly have been intended to draw Mr. Fox into any declarations unfavorable to his principles, since (by the account of those who are his friends) he had long before effectually prevented the success of any such scandalous designs.  Mr. Fox’s friends have themselves done away that imputation on Mr. Burke.

[9] See his speech on American Taxation, the 19th of April, 1774.

[10] Lord Lansdowne.

[11] Mr. Windham.

[12] July 17th, 1765.

[13] Works, Vol.  III. pp. 251-276, present edition.

[14] State Trials, Vol.  V. p. 651.

[15] Page 676.

[16] The words necessary to the completion of the sentence are wanting in the printed trial—­but the construction of the sentence, as well as the foregoing part of the speech, justify the insertion of some such supplemental words as the above.

[17] “What we did was, in truth and substance, and in a constitutional light, a revolution, not made, but prevented.  We took solid securities; we settled doubtful questions; we corrected anomalies in our law.  In the stable, fundamental parts of our Constitution we made no revolution,—­no, nor any alteration at all.  We did not impair the monarchy.  Perhaps it might be shown that we strengthened it very considerably.  The nation kept the same ranks, the same orders, the same privileges, the same franchises, the same rules for property, the same subordinations, the same order in the law, in the revenue, and in the magistracy,—­the same lords, the same commons, the same corporations, the same electors.”—­Mr. Burke’s Speech in the House of Commons, 9th February, 1790.—­It appears how exactly he coincides in everything with Sir Joseph Jekyl.

[18] See Reflections, pp. 42, 43.—­Works, Vol.  III. p. 270, present edition.

[19] Declaration of Right.

[20] Vindication of the Rights of Man, recommended by the several societies.