.. .. .. 309
576
3 B. 0 6 108 98 71 22 1 3 .. .. 309
G. 1 15 101 158 78 20 5 0 .. .. 378
687
4 B. .. 4 54 157 107 36 6 0 .. .. 364
G. .. 1 45 186 143 51 7 2 .. .. 435
799
5 B. .. 1 10 82 142 82 17 4 3 .. 341
G. .. 0 9 145 187 88 22 9 0 .. 460
801
6 B. .. .. 4 34 158 139 32 9 2 .. 378
G. .. .. 2 70 235 178 40 13 1 .. 539
917
7 B. .. 1 0 10 115 140 65 4 4 1 340
G. .. 0 2 7 130 187 69 19 0 0 414
754
8 B. .. .. .. 0 31 122 65 25 2 .. 245
G. .. .. .. 2 45 150 95 37 2 .. 331
576
9 B. .. .. .. .. 0 24 23 13 1 .. 61
G. .. .. .. .. 4 32 40 24 0 .. 100
161
10 B. .. .. .. .. .. 1 11 5 3 .. 20
G. .. .. .. .. .. 3 12 6 1 .. 22
42
Summary B. .. 108 355 537 670 571 225 63 15 1 2545
G. 6 109 401 757 875 724 292 110 4 0 3278
5823

[Footnote:  In the facts which are involved and in the manner of reading them, this table is similar to Table I. The mode of the distribution of totals for the ages is at 17 in this table.  Further reference will be made to both Tables I and II in later chapters of this study. (See pages 36, 37, 41, 42).]

A further analysis of the failures is here made in reference to the number of pupils and the number of failures each.

Table III

A distribution of failing pupils according to the number of failures
per pupil, in each semester

No.  Of                        semesters                        totals
failures     1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8     9  10

1 B. 459 430 375 352 271 221 157 113 22 11 2411
G. 561 535 428 421 328 261 167 123 35 9 2868
---------------------------
32.5% 5279

2 B. 271 242 211 206 149 144 79 68 19 4 1393
G. 271 253 238 204 177 142 127 84 17 6 1519
---------------------------
34.9% 2912

3 B. 144 106 81 73 59 60 45 27 6 2 603
G. 207 103 81 75 75 83 52 38 20 3 737
---------------------------
35% 1340

4 B. 83 39 33 30 27 32 10 10 1 1 266
G. 95 50 38 35 27 39 19 19 3 0 325
---------------------------
31.8% 591