Printed by Ballantyne
& co. Limited
Tavistock Street, London
* * * * *
The Fundamental Fallacies of Free Trade
By L.S. Amery
(Fellow of all souls College, Oxford)
Price 2s. net.
These “Four Addresses on the Logical Groundwork of the Free Trade Theory,” as they are described by the author on the title-page, are nothing less than a frontal attack on the dogmas of the Manchester School, as sacrificing the permanent interests of the nation to the ephemeral interests of the individual. They are bound on account of their originality and ability to provoke considerable controversy, and to compel the Cobdenites to make some attempt at an answer. The chapters are successively entitled “The Individualist Fallacy,” “The Capitalist Fallacy,” “The Trade Fallacy,” and “Free Trade Psychology and Free Trade History.”
This is essentially a book to be read, marked, learned, and inwardly digested by all serious students of public affairs.
THE “NATIONAL REVIEW” OFFICE 23 RYDER STREET, ST. JAMES’S, LONDON, S.W.
* * * * *
The
national
review
Edited by L.J. MAXSE
Price 2s. 6d. net
Monthly
Established 24 Years
* * * * *
The Outlook says:
“Its pages are packed with vital writing ... foreign and domestic affairs are discussed with masculine ability and vigour ... a monthly survey of Imperial affairs such as no other publication offers.”
The spectator says:
“We do not hesitate to say that the ‘National’s Episodes’ are among the most brilliant, if, indeed, not the most brilliant, contributions to modern political journalism. Their verve, their fearlessness, their independence, and their sincerity would alone render them remarkable; but in addition they are written in a style as clear and buoyant as it is picturesque and unconventional.”
* * * * *
Distinctive Features of the “National Review"
“Episodes of the month”
An incisive commentary on Home and Foreign Affairs
“American affairs”
By A. Maurice low
An indispensable guide to American Politics
“Greater Britain and India”
An invaluable review of Imperial events
Policy of the “National review”
To discuss each subject on its merits from the national standpoint without fear, favour, or partisan bias
* * * * *