I cannot help pausing here for a moment, to reflect upon the expressions of surprise which this minister has let fall relative to the excesses he relates.  To him the departure of the troops from their ancient principles of loyalty and honor seems quite inconceivable.  Surely those to whom he addresses himself know the causes of it but too well.  They know the doctrines which they have preached, the decrees which they have passed, the practices which they have countenanced.  The soldiers remember the sixth of October.  They recollect the French guards.  They have not forgot the taking of the king’s castles in Paris and at Marseilles.  That the governors in both places were murdered with impunity is a fact that has not passed out of their minds.  They do not abandon the principles, laid down so ostentatiously and laboriously, of the equality of men.  They cannot shut their eyes to the degradation of the whole noblesse of France, and the suppression of the very idea of a gentleman.  The total abolition of titles and distinctions is not lost upon them.  But M. du Pin is astonished at their disloyalty, when the doctors of the Assembly have taught them at the same time the respect due to laws.  It is easy to judge which of the two sorts of lessons men with arms in their hands are likely to learn.  As to the authority of the king, we may collect from the minister himself (if any argument on that head were not quite superfluous) that it is not of more consideration with these troops than it is with everybody else.  “The king,” says he, “has over and over again repeated his orders to put a stop to these excesses; but in so terrible a crisis, your [the Assembly’s] concurrence is become indispensably necessary to prevent the evils which menace the state. You unite to the force of the legislative power that of opinion, still more important.”  To be sure, the army can have no opinion of the power or authority of the king.  Perhaps the soldier has by this time learned, that the Assembly itself does not enjoy a much greater degree of liberty than that royal figure.

It is now to be seen what has been proposed in this exigency, one of the greatest that can happen in a state.  The minister requests the Assembly to array itself in all its terrors, and to call forth all its majesty.  He desires that the grave and severe principles announced by them may give vigor to the king’s proclamation.  After this we should have looked for courts civil and martial, breaking of some corps, decimating of others, and all the terrible means which necessity has employed in such cases to arrest the progress of the most terrible of all evils; particularly, one might expect that a serious inquiry would be made into the murder of commandants in the view of their soldiers.  Not one word of all this, or of anything like it.  After they had been told that the soldiery trampled upon the decrees of the Assembly promulgated by the king, the Assembly pass new decrees, and they authorize the king to make new