Mr. Burke said he should have felt very unpleasantly, if he had not delivered these sentiments.  He was near the end of his natural, probably still nearer the end of his political career.  That he was weak and weary, and wished for rest.  That he was little disposed to controversies, or what is called a detailed opposition.  That at his time of life, if he could not do something by some sort of weight of opinion, natural or acquired, it was useless and indecorous to attempt anything by mere struggle. Turpe senex miles.  That he had for that reason little attended the army business, or that of the revenue, or almost any other matter of detail, for some years past.  That he had, however, his task.  He was far from condemning such opposition; on the contrary, he most highly applauded it, where a just occasion existed for it, and gentlemen had vigor and capacity to pursue it.  Where a great occasion occurred, he was, and, while he continued in Parliament, would be, amongst the most active and the most earnest,—­as he hoped he had shown on a late event.  With respect to the Constitution itself, he wished few alterations in it,—­happy if he left it not the worse for any share he had taken in its service.

* * * * *

Mr. Fox then rose, and declared, in substance, that, so far as regarded the French army, he went no farther than the general principle, by which that army showed itself indisposed to be an instrument in the servitude of their fellow-citizens, but did not enter into the particulars of their conduct.  He declared that he did not affect a democracy:  that he always thought any of the simple, unbalanced governments bad:  simple monarchy, simple aristocracy, simple democracy,—­he held them all imperfect or vicious; all were bad by themselves; the composition alone was good.  That these had been always his principles, in which he had agreed with his friend Mr. Burke,—­of whom he had said many kind and flattering things, which Mr. Burke, I take it for granted, will know himself too well to think he merits from anything but Mr. Fox’s acknowledged good-nature.  Mr. Fox thought, however, that, in many cases, Mr. Burke was rather carried too far by his hatred to innovation.

Mr. Burke said, he well knew that these had been Mr. Fox’s invariable opinions; that they were a sure ground for the confidence of his country.  But he had been fearful that cabals of very different intentions would be ready to make use of his great name, against his character and sentiments, in order to derive a credit to their destructive machinations.

Mr. Sheridan then rose, and made a lively and eloquent speech against Mr. Burke; in which, among other things, he said that Mr. Burke had libelled the National Assembly of France, and had cast out reflections on such characters as those of the Marquis de La Fayette and Mr. Bailly.

Mr. Burke said, that he did not libel the National Assembly of France, whom he considered very little in the discussion of these matters.  That he thought all the substantial power resided in the republic of Paris, whose authority guided, or whose example was followed by, all the republics of France.  The republic of Paris had an army under their orders, and not under those of the National Assembly.