(7) Professor Sudhoff:  Bibliographia Paracelsica, Berlin, 1894,
     1899.

     (8) R. Julius Hartmann:  Theophrast von Hohenheim, Berlin, 1904;
     ditto, Franz Strunz, Leipzig, 1903.

     (9) Anna M. Stoddart:  The Life of Paracelsus, London, John
     Murray, 1911.

Paracelsus is the Luther of medicine, the very incarnation of the spirit of revolt.  At a period when authority was paramount, and men blindly followed old leaders, when to stray from the beaten track in any field of knowledge was a damnable heresy, he stood out boldly for independent study and the right of private judgment.  After election to the chair at Basel he at once introduced a startling novelty by lecturing in German.  He had caught the new spirit and was ready to burst all bonds both in medicine and in theology.  He must have startled the old teachers and practitioners by his novel methods.  “On June 5, 1527, he attached a programme of his lectures to the black-board of the University inviting all to come to them.  It began by greeting all students of the art of healing.  He proclaimed its lofty and serious nature, a gift of God to man, and the need of developing it to new importance and to new renown.  This he undertook to do, not retrogressing to the teaching of the ancients, but progressing whither nature pointed, through research into nature, where he himself had discovered and had verified by prolonged experiment and experience.  He was ready to oppose obedience to old lights as if they were oracles from which one did not dare to differ.  Illustrious doctor smight be graduated from books, but books made not a single physician.(10) Neither graduation, nor fluency, nor the knowledge of old languages, nor the reading of many books made a physician, but the knowledge of things themselves and their properties.  The business of a doctor was to know the different kinds of sicknesses, their causes, their symptoms and their right remedies.  This he would teach, for he had won this knowledge through experience, the greatest teacher, and with much toil.  He would teach it as he had learned it, and his lectures would be founded on works which he had composed concerning inward and external treatment, physic and surgery."(11) Shortly afterwards, at the Feast of St. John, the students had a bonfire in front of the university.  Paracelsus came out holding in his hands the “Bible of medicine,” Avicenna’s “Canon,” which he flung into the flames saying:  “Into St. John’s fire so that all misfortune may go into the air with the smoke.”  It was, as he explained afterwards, a symbolic act:  “What has perished must go to the fire; it is no longer fit for use:  what is true and living, that the fire cannot burn.”  With abundant confidence in his own capacity he proclaimed himself the legitimate monarch, the very Christ of medicine.  “You shall follow me,” cried he, “you, Avicenna, Galen, Rhasis, Montagnana, Mesues; you, Gentlemen of Paris, Montpellier, Germany, Cologne, Vienna, and whomsoever the Rhine and Danube nourish; you who inhabit the isles of the sea; you, likewise, Dalmatians, Athenians; thou, Arab; thou, Greek; thou, Jew; all shall follow me, and the monarchy shall be mine."(12)