schools. A strong revulsion of feeling arose
against the Arabians, and Avicenna, the Prince, who
had been clothed with an authority only a little less
than divine, became anathema. Under the leadership
of the Montpellier School, the Arabians made a strong
fight, but it was a losing battle all along the line.
This group of medical humanists—men who
were devoted to the study of the old humanities, as
Latin and Greek were called—has had a great
and beneficial influence upon the profession.
They were for the most part cultivated gentlemen with
a triple interest—literature, medicine and
natural history. How important is the part they
played may be gathered from a glance at the “Lives”
given by Bayle in his “Biographic Medicale”
(Paris, 1855) between the years 1500 and 1575.
More than one half of them had translated or edited
works of Hippocrates or Galen; many of them had made
important contributions to general literature, and
a large proportion of them were naturalists:
Leonicenus, Linacre, Champier, Fernel, Fracastorius,
Gonthier, Caius, J. Sylvius, Brasavola, Fuchsius,
Matthiolus, Conrad Gesner, to mention only those I
know best, form a great group. Linacre edited
Greek works for Aldus, translated works of Galen,
taught Greek at Oxford, wrote Latin grammars and founded
the Royal College of Physicians.(*) Caius was a keen
Greek scholar, an ardent student of natural history,
and his name is enshrined as co-founder of one of
the most important of the Cambridge colleges.
Gonthier, Fernel, Fuchs and Mattioli were great scholars
and greater physicians. Champier, one of the
most remarkable of the group, was the founder of the
Hotel Dieu at Lyons, and author of books of a characteristic
Renaissance type and of singular bibliographical interest.
In many ways greatest of all was Conrad Gesner, whose
mors inopinata at forty-nine, bravely fighting the
plague, is so touchingly and tenderly mourned by his
friend Caius.(2) Physician, botanist, mineralogist,
geologist, chemist, the first great modern bibliographer,
he is the very embodiment of the spirit of the age.(2a)
On the flyleaf of my copy of the “Bibliotheca
Universalis” (1545), is written a fine tribute
to his memory. I do not know by whom it is, but
I do know from my reading that it is true:
(*) Cf. Osler:
Thomas Linacre, Cambridge University Press,
1908.—Ed.
(2) Joannis Caii Britanni
de libris suis, etc., 1570.
(2a) See J. C. Bay:
Papers Bibliog. Soc. of America, 1916, X,
No. 2, 53-86.
“Conrad Gesner, who kept open house there for
all learned men who came into his neighborhood.
Gesner was not only the best naturalist among the
scholars of his day, but of all men of that century
he was the pattern man of letters. He was faultless
in private life, assiduous in study, diligent in maintaining
correspondence and good-will with learned men in all
countries, hospitable—though his means were
small—to every scholar that came into Zurich.
Prompt to serve all, he was an editor of other men’s
volumes, a writer of prefaces for friends, a suggestor
to young writers of books on which they might engage
themselves, and a great helper to them in the progress
of their work. But still, while finding time
for services to other men, he could produce as much
out of his own study as though he had no part in the
life beyond its walls.”