The character of Mallet having been introduced, and spoken of slightingly by Goldsmith; Johnson.  ’Why, Sir, Mallet had talents enough to keep his literary reputation alive as long as he himself lived; and that, let me tell you, is a good deal.’  Goldsmith.  ’But I cannot agree that it was so.  His literary reputation was dead long before his natural death.  I consider an authour’s literary reputation to be alive only while his name will ensure a good price for his copy from the booksellers.  I will get you (to Johnson,) a hundred guineas for any thing whatever that you shall write, if you put your name to it.’

Dr. Goldsmith’s new play, She Stoops to Conquer, being mentioned; Johnson.  ’I know of no comedy for many years that has so much exhilarated an audience, that has answered so much the great end of comedy—­making an audience merry.’

Goldsmith having said, that Garrick’s compliment to the Queen, which he introduced into the play of The Chances, which he had altered and revised this year, was mean and gross flattery; Johnson.  ’Why, Sir, I would not write, I would not give solemnly under my hand, a character beyond what I thought really true; but a speech on the stage, let it flatter ever so extravagantly, is formular.  It has always been formular to flatter Kings and Queens; so much so, that even in our church-service we have “our most religious King,” used indiscriminately, whoever is King.  Nay, they even flatter themselves;—­“we have been graciously pleased to grant.”  No modern flattery, however, is so gross as that of the Augustan age, where the Emperour was deified.  “Proesens Divus habebitur Augustus.”  And as to meanness, (rising into warmth,) how is it mean in a player,—­a showman,—­a fellow who exhibits himself for a shilling, to flatter his Queen?  The attempt, indeed, was dangerous; for if it had missed, what became of Garrick, and what became of the Queen?  As Sir William Temple says of a great General, it is necessary not only that his designs be formed in a masterly manner, but that they should be attended with success.  Sir, it is right, at a time when the Royal Family is not generally liked, to let it be seen that the people like at least one of them.’  Sir Joshua Reynolds.  ’I do not perceive why the profession of a player should be despised; for the great and ultimate end of all the employments of mankind is to produce amusement.  Garrick produces more amusement than any body.’  Boswell.  ’You say, Dr. Johnson, that Garrick exhibits himself for a shilling.  In this respect he is only on a footing with a lawyer who exhibits himself for his fee, and even will maintain any nonsense or absurdity, if the case requires it.  Garrick refuses a play or a part which he does not like; a lawyer never refuses.’  Johnson.  ’Why, Sir, what does this prove? only that a lawyer is worse.  Boswell is now like Jack in The Tale of a Tub, who, when he is puzzled by an argument, hangs himself.  He thinks I shall cut him down, but I’ll let him hang.’ (laughing vociferously.) Sir Joshua Reynolds.  ’Mr. Boswell thinks that the profession of a lawyer being unquestionably honourable, if he can show the profession of a player to be more honourable, he proves his argument.’