On Tuesday, March 31, he and I dined at General Paoli’s.

Dr. Johnson went home with me to my lodgings in Conduit-street and drank tea, previous to our going to the Pantheon, which neither of us had seen before.

He said, ’Goldsmith’s Life of Parnell is poor; not that it is poorly written, but that he had poor materials; for nobody can write the life of a man, but those who have eat and drunk and lived in social intercourse with him.’

I said, that if it was not troublesome and presuming too much, I would request him to tell me all the little circumstances of his life; what schools he attended, when he came to Oxford, when he came to London, &c. &c.  He did not disapprove of my curiosity as to these particulars; but said, ‘They’ll come out by degrees as we talk together.’

We talked of the proper use of riches.  Johnson.  ’If I were a man of a great estate, I would drive all the rascals whom I did not like out of the county at an election.’

We then walked to the Pantheon.  The first view of it did not strike us so much as Ranelagh, of which he said, the ’coup d’oeil was the finest thing he had ever seen.’  The truth is, Ranelagh is of a more beautiful form; more of it or rather indeed the whole rotunda, appears at once, and it is better lighted.  However, as Johnson observed, we saw the Pantheon in time of mourning, when there was a dull uniformity; whereas we had seen Ranelagh when the view was enlivened with a gay profusion of colours.  Mrs. Bosville, of Gunthwait, in Yorkshire, joined us, and entered into conversation with us.  Johnson said to me afterwards, ’Sir, this is a mighty intelligent lady.’

I said there was not half a guinea’s worth of pleasure in seeing this place.  Johnson.  ’But, Sir, there is half a guinea’s worth of inferiority to other people in not having seen it.’  Boswell.  ’I doubt, Sir, whether there are many happy people here.’  Johnson.  ’Yes, Sir, there are many happy people here.  There are many people here who are watching hundreds, and who think hundreds are watching them.’

Happening to meet Sir Adam Fergusson, I presented him to Dr. Johnson.  Sir Adam expressed some apprehension that the Pantheon would encourage luxury.  ’Sir, (said Johnson,) I am a great friend to publick amusements; for they keep people from vice.  You now (addressing himself to me,) would have been with a wench, had you not been here.—­O!  I forgot you were married.’

Sir Adam suggested, that luxury corrupts a people, and destroys the spirit of liberty.  Johnson.  ’Sir, that is all visionary.  I would not give half a guinea to live under one form of government rather than another.  It is of no moment to the happiness of an individual.  Sir, the danger of the abuse of power is nothing to a private man.  What Frenchman is prevented from passing his life as he pleases?’ Sir Adam.  ’But, Sir, in the British constitution it is surely of importance