Cyclopedia of Telephony & Telegraphy Vol. 1 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 436 pages of information about Cyclopedia of Telephony & Telegraphy Vol. 1.

Cyclopedia of Telephony & Telegraphy Vol. 1 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 436 pages of information about Cyclopedia of Telephony & Telegraphy Vol. 1.

Impedance Coils.  In telephony electromagnets frequently serve, as already stated, to perform other functions than the producing of motion by attracting or releasing their armatures.  They are required to act as impedance coils to present a barrier to the passage of alternating or other rapidly fluctuating currents, and at the same time to allow the comparatively free passage of steady currents.  Where it is desired that an electromagnet coil shall possess high impedance, it is usual to employ a laminated instead of a solid core.  This is done by building up a core of suitable size by laying together thin sheets of soft iron, or by forming a bundle of soft iron wires.  The use of laminated cores is for the purpose of preventing eddy currents, which, if allowed to flow, would not only be wasteful of energy but would also tend to defeat the desired high impedance.  Sometimes in iron-clad impedance coils, the iron shell is slotted longitudinally to break up the flow of eddy currents in the shell.

Frequently electromagnetic coils have only the function of offering impedance, where no requirements exist for converting any part of the electric energy into mechanical work.  Where this is the case, such coils are termed impedance, or retardation, or choke coils, since they are employed to impede or to retard or to choke back the flow of rapidly varying current.  The distinction, therefore, between an impedance coil and the coil of an ordinary electromagnet is one of function, since structurally they may be the same, and the same principles of design and construction apply largely to each.

Number of Turns.  It should be remembered that an impedance coil obstructs the passage of fluctuating current, not so much by ohmic resistance as by offering an opposing or counter-electromotive force.  Other things being equal, the counter-electromotive force of self-induction increases directly as the number of turns on a coil and directly as the number of lines of force threading the coil, and this latter factor depends also on the reluctance of the magnetic circuit.  Therefore, to secure high impedance we need many turns or low reluctance, or both.  Often, owing to requirements for direct-current carrying capacity and limitations of space, a very large number of turns is not permissible, in which case sufficiently high impedance to such rapid fluctuations as those of voice currents may be had by employing a magnetic circuit of very low reluctance, usually a completely closed circuit.

Kind of Iron. An important factor in the design of impedance coils is the grade of iron used in the magnetic circuit.  Obviously, it should be of the highest permeability and, furthermore, there should be ample cross-section of core to prevent even an approach to saturation.  The iron should, if possible, be worked at that density of magnetization at which it has the highest permeability in order to obtain the maximum impedance effects.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Cyclopedia of Telephony & Telegraphy Vol. 1 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.