There might have been a prudential reason for his declining at this time to be a pensioner of France, namely, lest his connexion with that crown should hurt his projects of a settlement which were then on the carpet.  This conjecture is strengthened by what he writes himself to the First President of the Court of Moneys, that the Ministers of some Princes having asked him whether he were attached to any Court, as was reported; he answered, that he would always remember with gratitude the favours shewn him in France, but that since he came away he was free and his own master:  he adds, that several considerable settlements both with regard to honour and profit were offered him; “but, says he, I keep always in mind the maxim, to deliberate long before coming to a resolution.  I hope however that my situation will permit me to see France again, and my dear friends, and to thank them personally; you, Messieurs de Thou, Descordes, Du Puis, Pelletier, whose names will remain engraven on my heart wherever fortune carries me.”  Lusson yielded to his reasons, and approved of his disinterestedness[182].

He led a dull life at Hamburg.  “I am extremely solitary here (he writes to his brother August 3, 1633[183]:) even the men of learning keep up no correspondence with one another.  I might easily support this irksomeness if I had my books and papers:  for I could employ myself in some work that would be useful to the public and no discredit to me:  but at present without these I am a kind of prisoner.”

The disagreeableness of his situation and the uneasiness of his mind were increased by the death of his Landlord after fourteen days illness[184].  He was a Merchant of more knowledge and good sense than we commonly find in men of that profession.  He left some young children, in whose education Grotius interested himself.  Writing on this subject to Vossius, he tells him that his Landlord’s two sons were at the Hague learning Grammar; that they were beginning to make Themes and Versions; that if what they had already learnt were not cultivated, they would soon forget it; and that the time which boys spent in their Studies at Hamburg was lost, the method of teaching being only fit to make blockheads.  “Several, he adds, employ preceptors in the education of their children; which method answers not expectation.  I never approved of it because I know that young people learn not but in company, and that study languishes where there is no emulation.  I also dislike those schools when the master scarce knows the names of his scholars, and where their number is so great that he cannot give that attention to each, which his different genius and capacity may require.  For this reason I would have a middle course followed:  that a master should take but ten or twelve, to stay in the house together, and be in one form, by which means he would not be overburdened.”  He begs of him to inform himself whether there was not such a house in Amsterdam where he might place Van Sorgen’s sons.  Vossius joined with Grotius in his thoughts on education[185].