consent.  Gaston’s constancy in persisting to keep his wife had in the end obliged the King to approve of the match.  The Prince told Grotius that he had always thought this marriage valid, and did not doubt but he was of the same mind.  Grotius answered, that the opinion of those who regarded such marriages as good, was without doubt most generally received.  They afterwards talked of Divinity:  the Prince had been well educated, and loved this kind of conversation.  The grand controversies concerning the Eucharist and the Pope’s authority came under consideration; but we know not the particulars.

FOOTNOTES: 

[334] Ep. 714. p. 299.

III.  The Pope, foreseeing that the conclusion of a peace was still very distant, proposed a truce, in hopes that while it continued they might labour more effectually in bringing about a peace.  France[335] and Sweden discovered no reluctance to suspend for some time the operations of the war; and Grotius received orders, as we have already seen, to confer with the French Ministry in order to settle the subsidies to be given Sweden, and the conditions of the truce.  Chavigny was nominated to treat with the Swedish Ambassador on this matter.  He visited Grotius on the twenty-seventh of April, 1638[336], and the Swedish Minister telling him, that he had full powers from the Queen to examine, in concert with the Minister whom the King should nominate, what was necessary to obtain an advantageous truce; Chavigny asked if he had also power to conclude the truce.  Grotius answered, if France and Sweden could agree, he had in that case permission to sign the truce.  Chavigny replied, that Cardinal Richelieu had learnt from Schmalz, lately arrived from Sweden with instructions for Grotius, that the Swedes wanted to have the same subsidies during the truce as they had during the war; which appeared very surprising; that he did not doubt but Grotius himself would think the claim unreasonable, since the truce was to be of long continuance, and the expence would be much less than in the time of war.  Grotius answered, that the truce would be attended with as much expence as the war, since the Swedes could not keep the countries, of which they were in possession, without great armies.  Chavigny replied, that the number of troops to be kept on foot during the truce might be settled:  upon which Grotius observed, that during the truce between the Spaniards and the United Provinces the latter preserved the liberty of maintaining as large garrisons as they thought necessary for their security; and that the King, after the example of Henry the Great his father, furnished them with the same succours during the peace as in time of war.  Chavigny maintained that the Swedes would have nothing to fear from their enemies whilst the truce lasted, on account of the great number and power of its guarantees:  to which Grotius answered, that the countries possessed by the Swedes were so distant from their allies, that if they did not continue in arms to guard against any unlooked-for invasion, those countries would be lost before they could receive assistance.