Boncinelli in being one was the one explaining that he knew what he was saying.  He did know what he was saying.  He did know that knowing what one is saying is something having meaning.

Boncinelli in feeling was feeling that he was living.  He was living.  He was feeling.

He was feeling, being feeling he could be one making something, and having completely arranged that thing the thing he was making he was one knowing that knowing that he was arranging what he had been making is something.  Knowing that knowing he was arranging what he is arranging is something he was one knowing that he was living.  In knowing that he was living he was knowing that he was feeling.  He was feeling and knowing that he was feeling he was knowing that he was arranging what he was feeling in what he had arranged in making the thing he knew he had beeen arranging.  He was feeling.

Why do you mind if you heard one thing and told something once and did not believe anything and denied everything, why do you mind if you continue something and admit everything and upset something and remember everything, why do you mind if you repeat something.  Why do you mind if you destroy nothing, if you arrange everything, if you continue anything, why do you mind if you admit something.  Why do you mind if you believe anything, if you admit everything, if you hear something why do you mind if you do not remember everything.  Why do you mind if you remember something, if you like anything, if you resist something, why do you mind if you do not forget everything.  Why do you mind if you do not resist anything, if you believe something, if you do not forget anything, if you like everything, why do you mind if you remember something.

Mr. Peter in saying something was saying that he was understanding something by knowing that he had heard before what he was then hearing.  Mr. Peter was often hearing what he had not heard before.  Mr. Peter was not always understanding something.  Mr. Peter was saying that he being one who was hearing was one who was saying that if he could have been one suffering he would have been one suffering in having been hearing what he was not understanding.  Mr. Peter was saying that he was one who could be suffering.  Mr. Peter was saying that he was one who was not suffering.  Mr. Peter was hearing what he would not have been understanding even if he had heard it before and he had not heard it before.  Mr. Peter was saying that he was not understanding it because he had not heard it before but he would not be understanding it if he had heard it before.  Mr. Peter was saying that he might not come to be understanding what he was hearing.  Mr. Peter was saying that he was not suffering.

Mrs. Peter was saying that having gone where she had gone she would not go again.  Mrs. Peter was saying that in not going again she was deciding that going again was a foolish thing when one did not like it when one had been.  Mrs. Peter might go again if she went with some one and Mrs. Peter said she might go with some one but Mrs. Peter said that she would very likely not go again as she very likely would not be going there with any one.  Mrs. Peter had been.  Mrs. Peter was not going again.