India was won and has been held and must be retained
by the sword alone, but that British rule was established
and has been maintained with and by the co-operation
of Indians and British, and that in seeking to-day
to associate Indians more closely than ever before
with the government and administration of the country,
we are merely persevering in the same path which,
though at times hesitatingly and reluctantly, the
British rulers of India have trodden for generations
past, always keeping step with the successive stages
of our own national and political evolution.
The Indian extremists misread equally the whole history
of British rule who see in it nothing but a long nightmare
of hateful oppression to be finally overcome, according
to Mr. Gandhi’s preaching, by “Non-co-operation”
and the immortal “soul force” of India,
rescued at last from the paralysing snares of an alien
civilisation. Not for the first time has the
cry of “Back to the Vedas” been raised
by Indians who, standing in the old ways, watch with
hostility and alarm the impact on their ancient but
static civilisation of the more dynamic civilisation
of the West with which we for the first time brought
India into contact. It would be folly to underrate
the resistance which the reactionary elements in Hinduism
are still capable of putting forth. I have shown
how it can still be seen operating in extreme forms,
and not upon Hindus alone, in the two pictures which
I have drawn from Delhi and Calcutta. It meets
one in a lesser degree at almost every turn all over
India. But it would be just as foolish to underrate
the progressive forces which show now as ever in the
history of Hinduism, that it is also capable of combining
with a singular rigidity of structure and with many
forms repugnant to all our own beliefs a breadth and
elasticity of thought by no means inferior to that
of the West.
To those who hoped for a more rapid and widespread
fusion of Indian and Western ideals, some of the phenomena
which have marked the latter-day revival of Hinduism
and the shape it has recently assumed in Mr. Gandhi’s
“Non-co-operation” campaign, may have brought
grave disappointment. But the inrush of Western
influences was assuredly bound to provoke a strong
reaction. For let us not forget that to the abiding
power of Hinduism India owes the one great element
of stability that enabled her, long before we appeared
in India, to weather so many tremendous storms without
altogether losing the sense of a great underlying
unity stronger and more enduring than all the manifold
lines of cleavage which have tended from times immemorial
to divide her. Hinduism has not only responded
for some forty centuries to the social and religious
aspirations of a large and highly endowed portion of
the human race, almost wholly shut off until modern
times from any intimate contact with our own Western
world, but it has been the one great force that has
preserved the continuity of Indian life. It withstood