century of our era Kanishka carried his victorious
arms down to the Gangetic plain, where Buddhism still
held its own in the region which had been its cradle;
and, according to one tradition, he carried off from
Pataliputra a famous Buddhist saint, who converted
him to Buddhism. But as these Indo-Scythian kings
had not been long enough in India to secure admission
to the social aristocracy of Hinduism by that slow
process of naturalisation to which so many ruling
families have owed their Kshatrya pedigrees, Kanishka,
having himself no claim to caste, may well have preferred
for reasons of state to favour Buddhism as a creed
fundamentally opposed to caste distinctions. Whatever
the motives of his conversion, we have it on the authority
of Hiuen-Tsang that he ultimately did great things
for Buddhism, and the magnificent
stupa, which
he erected outside his capital, five-and-twenty stories
high and crowned with a cupola of diamonds, was still
150 feet high and measured a quarter of a mile in
circumference when the Chinese pilgrim visited Purushpura
five centuries later. To the present day there
are traces outside the northern gate of Peshawar of
a great Buddhist monastery, also built by Kanishka,
which remained a seat of Buddhist learning until it
was destroyed by Mahomedan invaders; and it was only
a mile from Peshawar that the American Sanskritist,
Dr. Spooner, discovered ten years ago the casket containing
some of Buddha’s bones, which is one of the
most perfect specimens of Graeco-Buddhist art.
The Buddhist statues and bas-reliefs of that period
are Greek rather than Indian in their treatment of
sacred history, and even the head of Gautama himself
might sometimes be taken for that of a young Greek
god.
These exotic influences may indeed have acted as a
further solvent upon Buddhism. But in any case,
its local and temporary revival as a dominant state
religion under Kanishka, whose empire did not long
outlive him, failed to arrest its steady resorption
into Hinduism. On the one hand, Buddhism itself
was losing much of its original purity. The miraculous
legends with which the life of Buddha was gradually
invested, the almost idolatrous worship paid to him,
the belief that he himself was but the last of many
incarnations in which the Buddha had already revealed
himself from the very beginning of creation—all
these later accretions represent, no doubt, the reaction
upon Buddhism of its Hinduistic surroundings.
But they doubtless helped also to stimulate the growth
of the more definite forms of anthropomorphism which
characterised the development of Hinduism when the
ancient ritual and the more impersonal gods of the
Vedas and of the Brahmanas gave way to the cult of
such very personal gods as Shiva and Vishnu, with
their feminine counterparts, Kali and Lakshmi, and
ultimately to the evolution of still more popular
deities, some, like Skanda and the elephant-headed
Ganesh, closely connected with Shiva; others like
Krishna and Rama, av[=a]taras or incarnations—and