to reveal from time to time the
ignes cineri suppositos
doloso. They mostly follow the same course.
Khilafat agitators terrorise the law-abiding
population, extorting subscriptions for
Khilafat
funds, compelling shopkeepers to close their shops
for
Khilafat demonstrations, and so forth,
until they are driven to appeal to the authorities
for protection. Then an attempt is made to arrest
some of the ringleaders or to disarm the
Khilafat
“volunteers,” who, when they have no more
modern weapons, know how to use their
lathis
or heavy iron-tipped staves with often deadly effect.
Rioting starts on a large scale to the cry of “Religion!
Religion!” the small local police force is helpless,
and very soon the whole fury of the Mahomedan mob turns
against the Hindus, as at Malegaon, in the Bombay Presidency,
where they set a Hindu temple on fire and threw into
the flames the body of an unfortunate Hindu sub-inspector
of police who had been vainly attempting to save a
Hindu quarter from arson. Troops are hurried up
from the nearest military station, and usually as
soon as they appear order is restored with the employment
of a minimum amount of force. Numerous arrests
are made, and a few of the local firebrands are ultimately
prosecuted and convicted. But at “Non-co-operation”
headquarters the
Khilafat propaganda goes on
undisturbed, and all the appearances of Hindu-Mahomedan
unity are ostentatiously kept up. Mr. Mahomed
Ali preaches to Hindus as well as to Mahomedans that
it will be their duty to give the Ameer of Afghanistan
every assistance in their power when he descends with
his armies to rescue India from her foreign oppressors.
An All-India
Khilafat Conference announces
that, if the British Government fights openly or secretly
against the Turkish Nationalists at Angora, the Indian
National Congress will proclaim the Republic of India
at its next session, and meanwhile declares it unlawful
for any Mahomedan to serve in the Indian army, since
a “Satanic” Government may at any moment
use it to fight against Mustafa Kemal’s forces
at Angora. It is impossible to believe that on
such lines “Non-co-operation” can bring
Mahomedans and Hindus permanently together, or can
drag the bulk of the sober and conservative Mahomedan
community away from its solid moorings, but the effect
of such appeals to the turbulent and fanatical elements,
more numerous and more easily roused amongst Mahomedans
than amongst Hindus, spreads and grows with the impunity
conceded to them.
If, on the other hand, the Hindus may be on the whole
less prone to violence than the Mahomedans, with whom
the sword is still the symbol of their faith, the
grave agrarian disturbances which have twice this year
resulted from the “Non-co-operation” campaign
in the United Provinces, and other disorders of a
similar kind on a less serious scale in other provinces,
show that Hindus too are not proof against temptations
to violence. Mr. Gandhi may go on preaching non-violence,
and he may himself still disapprove of violence and
refuse to believe that his teachings, as interpreted
at least by many of his followers, are as certain
to produce violence as the night is to produce darkness;
but that “Non-co-operation” more and more
frequently spells violence is beyond dispute, and
more and more faint-hearted—to put it very
mildly—are his reprobations of violence.