my sister, the said Julia Verinder.  And I desire that my said sister may be informed, by means of a true copy of this, the third and last clause of my Will, that I give the Diamond to her daughter Rachel, in token of my free forgiveness of the injury which her conduct towards me has been the means of inflicting on my reputation in my lifetime; and especially in proof that I pardon, as becomes a dying man, the insult offered to me as an officer and a gentleman, when her servant, by her orders, closed the door of her house against me, on the occasion of her daughter’s birthday.”

More words followed these, providing if my lady was dead, or if Miss Rachel was dead, at the time of the testator’s decease, for the Diamond being sent to Holland, in accordance with the sealed instructions originally deposited with it.  The proceeds of the sale were, in that case, to be added to the money already left by the Will for the professorship of chemistry at the university in the north.

I handed the paper back to Mr. Franklin, sorely troubled what to say to him.  Up to that moment, my own opinion had been (as you know) that the Colonel had died as wickedly as he had lived.  I don’t say the copy from his Will actually converted me from that opinion:  I only say it staggered me.

“Well,” says Mr. Franklin, “now you have read the Colonel’s own statement, what do you say?  In bringing the Moonstone to my aunt’s house, am I serving his vengeance blindfold, or am I vindicating him in the character of a penitent and Christian man?”

“It seems hard to say, sir,” I answered, “that he died with a horrid revenge in his heart, and a horrid lie on his lips.  God alone knows the truth.  Don’t ask me.”

Mr. Franklin sat twisting and turning the extract from the Will in his fingers, as if he expected to squeeze the truth out of it in that manner.  He altered quite remarkably, at the same time.  From being brisk and bright, he now became, most unaccountably, a slow, solemn, and pondering young man.

“This question has two sides,” he said.  “An Objective side, and a Subjective side.  Which are we to take?”

He had had a German education as well as a French.  One of the two had been in undisturbed possession of him (as I supposed) up to this time.  And now (as well as I could make out) the other was taking its place.  It is one of my rules in life, never to notice what I don’t understand.  I steered a middle course between the Objective side and the Subjective side.  In plain English I stared hard, and said nothing.

“Let’s extract the inner meaning of this,” says Mr. Franklin.  “Why did my uncle leave the Diamond to Rachel?  Why didn’t he leave it to my aunt?”

“That’s not beyond guessing, sir, at any rate,” I said.  “Colonel Herncastle knew my lady well enough to know that she would have refused to accept any legacy that came to her from him.”

“How did he know that Rachel might not refuse to accept it, too?”