difficulties of the thoughts and arguments themselves.
Locke on the Human Understanding is a work that has
probably been often recommended to you. Perhaps,
if you keep steadily in view the danger of his materialistic,
unpoetic, and therefore untrue philosophy, the book
may do you more good than harm; it will furnish you
with useful exercise for your thinking powers; and
you will see it so often quoted as authority, on one
side as truth, on the other as falsehood, that it
may be as well you should form your own judgment of
it. You should previously, however, become guarded
against any dangers that might result from your study
of Locke, by acquiring a thorough-knowledge of the
philosophy of Coleridge. This will so approve
itself to your conscience, your intellect, and your
imagination, that there can be no risk of its being
ever supplanted in a mind like yours by “plebeian"[79]
systems of philosophy. Few have now any difficulty
in perceiving the infidel tendencies of that of Locke,
especially with the assistance of his French philosophic
followers, (with whose writings, for the charms of
style and thought, you will probably become acquainted
in future years.) They have declared what the real
meaning of his system is by the developments which
they have proved to be its necessary consequences.
Let Coleridge, then, be your previous study, and the
philosophic system detailed in his various writings
may serve as a nucleus, round which all other philosophy
may safely enfold itself. The writings of Coleridge
form an era in the history of the mind; and their
progress in altering the whole character of thought,
not only in this but in foreign nations, if it has
been slow, (which is one of the necessary conditions
of permanence,) has been already astonishingly extensive.
Even those who have never heard of the name of Coleridge
find their habits of thought moulded, and their perceptions
of truth cleared and deepened, by the powerful influence
of his master-mind,—powerful still, though
it has probably only reached them through three or
four interposing mediums. The proud boast of one
of his descendants is amply verified: “He
has given the power of vision:” and in
ages yet to come, many who may unfortunately be ignorant
of the very name of their benefactor will still be
profiting daily, more and more, by the mental telescopes
he has provided. Thus it is that many have rejoiced
in having the distant brought near to them, and the
confused made clear, without knowing that Jansen was
the name of him who had conferred such benefits upon
mankind. The immediate artist, the latest moulder
of an original design, is the one whose skill is extolled
and depended upon; and so it is even already in the
case of Coleridge. It is those only who are intimately
acquainted with him who can plainly see, that it is
by the power of vision he has conferred that the really
philosophic writers of the present day are enabled
to give views so clear and deep on the many subjects