If we abolish the dream displacement, we attain through analysis quite certain conclusions regarding two problems of the dream which are most disputed—­as to what provokes a dream at all, and as to the connection of the dream with our waking life.  There are dreams which at once expose their links with the events of the day; in others no trace of such a connection can be found.  By the aid of analysis it can be shown that every dream, without any exception, is linked up with our impression of the day, or perhaps it would be more correct to say of the day previous to the dream.  The impressions which have incited the dream may be so important that we are not surprised at our being occupied with them whilst awake; in this case we are right in saying that the dream carries on the chief interest of our waking life.  More usually, however, when the dream contains anything relating to the impressions of the day, it is so trivial, unimportant, and so deserving of oblivion, that we can only recall it with an effort.  The dream content appears, then, even when coherent and intelligible, to be concerned with those indifferent trifles of thought undeserving of our waking interest.  The depreciation of dreams is largely due to the predominance of the indifferent and the worthless in their content.

Analysis destroys the appearance upon which this derogatory judgment is based.  When the dream content discloses nothing but some indifferent impression as instigating the dream, analysis ever indicates some significant event, which has been replaced by something indifferent with which it has entered into abundant associations.  Where the dream is concerned with uninteresting and unimportant conceptions, analysis reveals the numerous associative paths which connect the trivial with the momentous in the psychical estimation of the individual. It is only the action of displacement if what is indifferent obtains recognition in the dream content instead of those impressions which are really the stimulus, or instead of the things of real interest.  In answering the question as to what provokes the dream, as to the connection of the dream, in the daily troubles, we must say, in terms of the insight given us by replacing the manifest latent dream content:  The dream does never trouble itself about things which are not deserving of our concern during the day, and trivialities which do not trouble us during the day have no power to pursue us whilst asleep.

What provoked the dream in the example which we have analyzed?  The really unimportant event, that a friend invited me to a free ride in his cab.  The table d’hote scene in the dream contains an allusion to this indifferent motive, for in conversation I had brought the taxi parallel with the table d’hote.  But I can indicate the important event which has as its substitute the trivial one.  A few days before I had disbursed a large sum of money for a member of my family who is very dear to me.  Small wonder,