because of certain intellectual conceptions at which she has arrived.  She sees other workmen come to him for shrewd advice; she knows that he spends many more hours in the public library reading good books than the average workman has time to do.  He has formed no bad habits and has yielded only to those subtle temptations toward a life of leisure which come to the intellectual man.  He lacks the qualifications which would induce his union to engage him as a secretary or organizer, but he is a constant speaker at workingmen’s meetings, and takes a high moral attitude on the questions discussed there.  He contributes a certain intellectuality to his friends, and he has undoubted social value.  The neighboring women confide to the charity visitor their sympathy with his wife, because she has to work so hard, and because her husband does not “provide.”  Their remarks are sharpened by a certain resentment toward the superiority of the husband’s education and gentle manners.  The charity visitor is ashamed to take this point of view, for she knows that it is not altogether fair.  She is reminded of a college friend of hers, who told her that she was not going to allow her literary husband to write unworthy potboilers for the sake of earning a living.  “I insist that we shall live within my own income; that he shall not publish until he is ready, and can give his genuine message.”  The charity visitor recalls what she has heard of another acquaintance, who urged her husband to decline a lucrative position as a railroad attorney, because she wished him to be free to take municipal positions, and handle public questions without the inevitable suspicion which unaccountably attaches itself in a corrupt city to a corporation attorney.  The action of these two women seemed noble to her, but in their cases they merely lived on a lesser income.  In the case of the workingman’s wife, she faced living on no income at all, or on the precarious one which she might be able to get together.

She sees that this third woman has made the greatest sacrifice, and she is utterly unwilling to condemn her while praising the friends of her own social position.  She realizes, of course, that the situation is changed by the fact that the third family needs charity, while the other two do not; but, after all, they have not asked for it, and their plight was only discovered through an accident to one of the children.  The charity visitor has been taught that her mission is to preserve the finest traits to be found in her visited family, and she shrinks from the thought of convincing the wife that her husband is worthless and she suspects that she might turn all this beautiful devotion into complaining drudgery.  To be sure, she could give up visiting the family altogether, but she has become much interested in the progress of the crippled child who eagerly anticipates her visits, and she also suspects that she will never know many finer women than the mother.  She is unwilling, therefore, to give up the friendship, and goes on bearing her perplexities as best she may.