occupying the territory which they covet. Both
States may therefore be expected to abandon their neutrality
and to invade Austria-Hungary without delay as soon
as they hear that that country seriously contemplates
entering upon peace negotiations; it follows that
if Austria-Hungary wishes to withdraw from the stricken
field she must open negotiations with the utmost secrecy
and conclude them with the utmost speed. It is
clear that if Italy and Rumania should be given the
much desired opportunity of joining the Entente powers,
the Dual Monarchy would lose not only Polish Galicia
and Serbian Bosnia and Herzegovina but Rumanian Transylvania
and the Banat, with about 5,000,000 inhabitants, and
the largely Italian Trentino, Istria, and Dalmatia,
with at least 1,000,000 people, as well. These
vast losses would probably lead to the total dismemberment
of the State, for the remaining subject nationalities
would also demand their freedom. Self-preservation
is the first law and the first duty of individuals
and of States. It is therefore conceivable, and
is indeed only logical, that Austria-Hungary will
conclude overnight a separate peace. If she should
take that wise and necessary step, isolated Germany
would either have to give up the unequal struggle
or fight on single-handed. In the latter case,
her defeat would no doubt be rapid. It seems,
therefore, quite possible that the end of the war
may be as sudden as was its beginning. Hence,
the consideration of the Polish question seems not
only useful but urgent....
From the very beginning Prussia, Austria, and Russia
treated Poland as a corpus vile, and cut it up like
a cake, without any regard to the claims, the rights,
and the protests of the Poles themselves. Although
history only mentions three partitions, there were
in reality seven. There were those of 1772, 1793,
and 1795, already referred to; and these were followed
by a redistribution of the Polish territories in 1807,
1809, and 1815. In none of these were the inhabitants
consulted or even considered. The Congress of
Vienna established the independence of Cracow, but
Austria-Hungary, asserting that she considered herself
“threatened” by the existence of that tiny
State, seized it in 1846.
While Prussia, Austria, and Russia, considering that
might was right, had divided Poland among themselves,
regardless of the passionate protests of the inhabitants,
England had remained a spectator, but not a passive
one, of the tragedy. She viewed the action of
the allies with strong disapproval, but although she
gave frank expression to her sentiments, she did not
actively interfere. After all, no English interests
were involved in the partition. It was not her
business to intervene. Besides, she could not
successfully have opposed single-handed the joint
action of the three powerful partner States, especially
as France, under the weak Louis XV., held aloof.
However, English statesmen refused to consider as
valid the five partitions which took place before
and during the Napoleonic era.