through the agency of others). Such sons can never
belong, even as daughter’s sons, to their maternal
grandfather in consequence of his having sold their
mother for a price and lost all his rights in or to
her by that act.[291] Such sons, again, become full
of malice, unrighteous in conduct, the misappropriators
of other people’s wealth, and endued with deceit
and cunning. Having sprung from that sinful form
of marriage called Asura, the issue becomes wicked
in conduct. Persons acquainted with the histories
of olden times, conversant with duties, devoted to
the scriptures and firm in maintaining the restraints
therein laid down, recite in this connection some metrical
lines sung in days of yore by Yama. Even this
is what Yama had sung. That man who acquires
wealth by selling his own son, or who bestows his
daughter after accepting a dower for his own livelihood,
has to sink in seven terrible hells one after another,
known by the name of Kalasutra. There that wretch
has to feed upon sweat and urine and stools during
the whole time. In that form of marriage which
is called Arsha, the person who weds has to give a
bull and a cow and the father of the maiden accepts
the gift. Some characterise this gift as a dowry
(or price), while some are of opinion that it should
not be regarded in that light. The true opinion,
however, is that a gift for such a purpose, be it of
small value or large, should, O king, be regarded as
dowry or price, and the bestowal of the daughter under
such circumstances should be viewed as a sale.
Notwithstanding the fact of its having been practised
by a few persons it can never be taken as the eternal
usage. Other forms of marriage are seen, practised
by men, such as marrying girls after abducting them
by force from amidst their kinsmen. Those persons
who have sexual intercourse with a maiden, after reducing
her to subjection by force, are regarded as perpetrators
of sin. They have to sink in darkest hell.[292]
Even a human being with whom one has no relationship
of blood should not form the subject of sale.
What need then be said of one’s own issue?
With the wealth that is acquired by doing sinful deeds,
no action leading to merit can be performed.’”
SECTION XLVI
“Bhishma said, They that are conversant with
ancient history recite the following verse of Daksha,
the son of Prachetas: That maiden, in respect
of whom nothing is taken by her kinsmen in the form
of dowry cannot be said to be sold.[293] Respect,
kind treatment, and everything else that is agreeable,
should all be given unto the maiden whose hand is taken
in marriage. Her sire and brothers and father-in-law
and husband’s brothers should show her every
respect and adorn her with ornaments, if they be desirous
of reaping benefits, for such conduct on their part
always leads to considerable happiness and advantage.
If the wife does not like her husband or fails to
gladden him, from such dislike and absence of joy,