Valmiki in his early years and Viswamitra during a
famine). Some amongst them are fond of fomenting
quarrels and disputes (like Narada). Some, again,
amongst them are actors and dancers (like Bharata).
Some amongst them are competent to achieve all feats,
ordinary and extraordinary (like Agastya drinking
up the entire ocean, as if it were a palmful of water).
The Brahmanas, O chief of Bharata’s race are
of diverse aspects and behaviour. One should
always utter the praises of the Brahmanas who are
conversant with all duties, who are righteous of behaviour,
who are devoted to diverse kinds of act, and who are
seen to derive their sustenance from diverse kinds
of occupations.[256] The Brahmanas, O ruler of men,
who are highly blessed, are elder in respect of their
origin than the Pitris, the deities, human beings
(belonging to the three other orders), the Snakes
and the Rakshasas. These regenerate persons are
incapable of being vanquished by the deities or the
Pitris, or the Gandharvas or the Rakshasas, or the
Asuras or the Pisachas. The Brahmanas are competent
to make him a deity that is not a deity They can, again,
divest one that is a deity of his status as such.
He becomes a king whom they wish to make a king.
He, on the other hand, goes to the wall whom they
do not love or like. I tell thee truly, O king,
that those foolish persons, without doubt, meet with
destruction who calumniate the Brahmanas and utter
their dispraise. Skilled in praise and dispraise,
and themselves the origin or cause of other people’s
fame and ignominy the Brahmanas, O king, always become
angry with those that seek to injure others.
That man whom the Brahmanas praise succeeds in growing
in prosperity. That man who is censured and is
cast off by the Brahmanas soon meets with discomfiture.
It is in consequence of the absence of Brahmanas from
among them that the Sakas, the Yavanas, the Kamvojas
and other Kshatriya tribes have become fallen and
degraded into the status of Sudras. The Dravidas,
the Kalingas, the Pulandas, the Usinaras, the Kolisarpas,
the Mahishakas and other Kshatriyas, have, in consequence
of the absence of Brahmanas from among their midst,
become degraded into Sudras. Defeat at their
hands is preferable to victory over them, O foremost
of victorious persons. One slaying all other living
creatures in the world does not incur a sin so heinous
as that of slaying a single Brahmana. The great
Rishis have said that Brahmanicide is a heinous sin.
One should never utter the dispraise or calumny of
the Brahmanas. Where the dispraise of Brahmanas
is uttered, one should sit with face hanging down
or leave that spot (for avoiding both the utterer and
his words). That man has not as yet been born
in this world or will not take birth here, who has
been or will be able to pass his life in happiness
after quarrelling with the Brahmanas. One cannot
seize the wind with one’s hands. One cannot
touch the moon with one’s hand. One cannot
support the Earth on one’s arms. After
the same manner, O king, one is not able to vanquish
the Brahmanas in this world.’”