impelled by their virtuous inclinations. The
king should, therefore, make presents of diverse kinds
of valuable wealth unto them. That Brahmana who
hath a sufficiency of stores for feeding his family
for three or more years, deserves to drink the Soma.[470]
If not withstanding the presence of a virtuous king
on the throne, the sacrifice begun by anybody, especially
by a Brahmana, cannot be completed for want of only
a fourth part of the estimated expenses, then the
king should, for the completion of that sacrifice,
take away from his kinsmen the wealth of a Vaisya that
is possessed of a large flock of cattle but that is
averse from sacrifices and abstains from quaffing
Soma. The Sudra has no competence for performing
a sacrifice. The king should, therefore, take
away (wealth for such a purpose) from a Sudra house
of ours.[471] The king should also, without any scruple,
take away from the kinsmen the wealth of him who does
not perform sacrifices though possessed of a hundred
kine and also of him who abstains from sacrifices
though possessed of a thousand kine. The king
should always publicly take away the wealth of such
a person as does not practise charity, by acting in
this way the king earns great merit. Listen again
to me. That Brahmana who has been forced by want
to go without six meals,[472] may take away without
permission, according to the rule of a person that
cares only for today without any thought of the morrow,
only what is necessary for a single meal, from the
husking tub or the field or the garden or any other
place of even a man of low pursuits. He should,
however, whether asked or unasked, inform the king
of his act.[473] If the king be conversant with duty
he should not inflict any punishment upon such a Brahmana.
He should remember that a Brahmana becomes afflicted
with hunger only through the fault of the Kshatriya.[474]
Having ascertained a Brahmana’s learning and
behaviour, the king should make a provision for him,
and protect him as a father protects the son of his
own loins. On the expiry of every year, one should
perform the Vaisvanara sacrifice (if he is unable to
perform any animal or Soma sacrifice). They who
are conversant with religion say that the practice
of an act laid down in the alternative, is not destructive
of virtue. The Viswedevas, the Sadhyas, the Brahmanas,
and great Rishis, fearing death in seasons of distress,
do not scruple to have recourse to such provisions
in the scriptures as have been laid down in the alternative.
That man, however, who while able to live according
to the primary provision, betakes himself to the alternative,
comes to be regarded as a wicked person and never
succeeds in winning any felicity in heaven. A
Brahmana conversant with the Vedas should never speak
of his energy and knowledge to the king. (It is the
duty of the king to ascertain it himself.) Comparing
again the energy of a Brahmana with that of the king,
the former will always be found to be superior to the
latter. For this reason the energy of the Brahmanas