can rule, expecting victory. A king should provide
for the observance of morality by the aid of his understanding
and guided by knowledge derived from various sources.
The duties of a king can never be discharged by rules
drawn from a morality that is one-sided. A weak-minded
king can never display wisdom (in the discharge of
his duties) in consequence of his not having drawn
any wisdom from the examples before him. Righteousness
sometimes takes the shape of unrighteousness.
The latter also sometimes takes the shape of the former.
He who does not know this, becomes confounded when
confronted by an actual instance of the kind.
Before the occasion comes, one should, O Bharata,
comprehend the circumstances under which righteousness
and its reverse become confused. Having acquired
this knowledge, a wise king should, when the occasion
comes, act accordingly, aided by his judgment.
The acts he does at such a time are misunderstood by
ordinary people. Some persons are possessed of
true knowledge. Some persons have false knowledge.
Truly ascertaining the nature of each kind of knowledge,
a wise king derives knowledge from them that are regarded
as good. They that are really breakers of morality
find fault with the scriptures. They that have
themselves no wealth proclaim the inconsistencies of
the treatises on the acquisition of wealth. Those
who seek to acquire knowledge for the object only
of carrying their sustenance by it, O king, are sinful
besides being enemies of morality. Wicked men,
of immature understandings, can never know things
truly, even as persons unconversant with scriptures
are unable in all their acts to be guided by reason.
With eyes directed to the faults of the scriptures,
they decry the scriptures. Even if they understand
the true meaning of the scriptures, they are still
in the habit of proclaiming that scriptural injunctions
are unsound. Such men, by decrying the knowledge
of others proclaim the superiority of their own knowledge.
They have words for their weapons and words for their
arrows and speak as if they are real masters of their
sciences. Know, O Bharata, that they are traders
in learning and Rakshasas among men. By the aid
of mere pretexts they cast off that morality which
has been established by good and wise men. It
has been heard by us that the texts of morality are
not to be understood by either discussion or one’s
own intelligence. Indra. himself has said that
this is the opinion of the sage Vrihaspati. Some
are of opinion that no scriptural text has been laid
down without a reason. Others again, even if
they properly understand the scriptures, never act
according to them. One class of wise men declare
that morality is nothing else than the approved course
of the world. The man of true knowledge should
find out for himself the morality laid down for the
good. If even a wise man speaks of morality under
the influence of wrath or confusion of understanding
or ignorance, his deliverances go for nothing.