is not clearly proved against a relative, a friend,
a servant, or a wife, he that reflects long before
inflicting the punishment is applauded.’
Thus, O Bharata, was Gautama pleased with his son,
O thou of Kuru’s race, for that act of delay
on the latter’s part in doing the former’s
bidding. In all acts a man should, in this way,
reflect for a long time and then settle what he should
do. By conducting himself in this way one is
sure to avoid grief for a long time. That man
who never nurses his wrath for a long while, who reflects
for a long time before setting himself to the performance
of any act, never does any act which brings repentance.
One should wait for a long while upon those that are
aged, and sitting near them show them reverence.
One should attend to one’s duties for a long
time and be engaged for a long while in ascertaining
them. Waiting for a long time upon those that
are learned, are reverentially serving for a long
time those that are good in behaviour, and keeping
one’s soul for a long while under proper restraint,
one succeeds in enjoying the respect of the world for
a long time. One engaged in instructing others
on the subject of religion and duty, should, when
asked by another for information on those subjects,
take a long time to reflect before giving an answer.
He may then avoid indulging in repentance (for returning
an incorrect answer whose practical consequences may
lead to sin).—As regards Gautama of austere
penances, that Rishi, having adored the deities for
a long while in that retreat of his, at last ascended
to heaven with his son.’”
SECTION CCLXVII
“Yudhishthira said, ’How, indeed, should
the king protect his subjects without injuring anybody.
I ask thee this, O grandsire, tell me, O foremost
of good men!’
“Bhishma said, ’In this connection is
cited the old narrative of the conversation between
Dyumatsena and king Satyavat. We have heard that
upon a certain number of individuals having been brought
out for execution at the command of his sire (Dyumatsena),
prince Satyavat said certain words that had never
before been said by anybody else.[1212] ’Sometimes
righteousness assumes the form of iniquity, and iniquity
assumes the form of righteousness. It can never
be possible that the killing of individuals can ever
be a righteous act.’
“Dyumatsena said, ’If the sparing of those
that deserve to be slain be righteousness, if robbers
be spared, O Satyavat, then all distinctions (between
virtue and vice) would disappear. ’This
is mine’,—’This (other) is
not his’—ideas like these (with respect
to property) will not (if the wicked be not punished)
prevail in the Kali age. (If the wicked be not punished)
the affairs of the world will come to a deadlock.
If thou knowest how the world may go on (without punishing
the wicked), then discourse to me upon it.’