“Then, Florry, your position is untenable, for Romish prelates of the present day do most unquestionably defend the theory of the annual occurrence of miracles.  Bishop ——­, whose intellectual endowments are the constant theme of encomiums, has recently visited Italy.  On his return to America, he brought with him a valuable collection of relics, which he distributed among the members of his church.  Florry, I can vouch for the truth of what I now say.  He declared himself extremely fortunate in having happened at Naples during the anniversary of the death of St. Janarius.  Said he, ’I repaired to the place of his martyrdom, and took into my own hand the vial containing the blood of the blessed saint, now decomposed.  As the hour rolled around I watched the holy dust in breathless anxiety; at the appointed moment I perceived a change in its appearance, and while I held the vial in my hand the ashes liquefied and became veritable blood; while the dark spots on a neighboring stone turned of a deep crimson.’  Now the bishop related this miracle far and wide and priests ministering at the altar repeated his words to their listening flocks.  Sanctioned by the example of their prelates, do you wonder that the ignorant masses of the Romish church should implicitly rely upon the intercession of saints, and place unbounded confidence in the miraculous powers imputed to relics?  Again, the Manuals placed in the hands of the laity, are compiled under the special supervision of these ecclesiastical professors, who necessarily indorse all we see there advanced.  In the Ursuline Manual I find this assertion:  ’The Hail Mary was composed in Heaven, dictated by the Holy Ghost, and delivered to the faithful by the Angel Gabriel!’ Now, Florry, does not this seem blasphemy, bordering on the absurd?  What conscientious, honest, enlightened Christian would unblushingly defend such a declaration?”

“But, Mary, admitting as you do, that you believe there exist many truly conscientious members of this sect, why indulge your apprehension at the promulgation of its tenets?” replied Florence.

“I might answer you, Florry, in the words of Henry IV., who inquired of a celebrated Protestant divine, ’if a man might be saved by the Roman Catholic religion?’ ‘Undoubtedly,’ replied the clergyman, ’if his life and heart be holy.’  ‘Then,’ said the king, ’according to both Catholics and Protestants, I may be saved by the Catholic religion; but if I embrace your religion, I shall not be saved according to the Catholics.’  Thus Henry most unquestionably adjudged Protestants the more tolerant of the two sects.  Here, Florry, you have the clew to my anti-Romanism.  I fear the extension of papal doctrines, because liberty of conscience was never yet allowed where sufficient power was vested in the Roman Catholic clergy to compel submission.  To preserve the balance of power in ecclesiastical affairs is the only aim of Protestants.  We but contend for the privilege