being invalidated by an Irish Parliament. We
may point out that an amendment to the 1893 Home Rule
Bill, designed to safeguard such marriages, was rejected
by the vote of the Irish Nationalist party. But
even were legislation affecting the marriage laws
of the minority to be placed outside the control of
a Dublin Parliament, the effect would not be to reassure
the Protestant community. Mr. James Campbell mentions
a case which has profoundly stirred the Puritan feelings
of Irish Protestantism. A man charged with bigamy
has been released without punishment because the first
marriage, although in conformity with the law of the
land, was not recognised by the Roman Catholic Church.
However justifiable that course may have been in the
exceptional circumstances of that particular case,
the precedent obviously prepares the way for a practical
reversal of the law by executive or judicial action.
We must remember that, since the
Ne Temere decree
has come into force, the marriages of Protestants
and Roman Catholics are held by the Roman Catholic
Church to be absolutely null and void unless they are
celebrated in a Roman Catholic Church. We have
also to bear in mind that these marriages will not
be permitted by the priesthood except under conditions
which many Irish Protestants consider humiliating and
impossible. No more deadly attack upon the faith
of the Protestant minority in the three provinces
in Ireland can be imagined than to make a denial of
their faith the essential condition to the enjoyment
of the highest happiness for which they may look upon
this earth.
The second decree prohibits, under pain of excommunication,
any Roman Catholic from bringing an ecclesiastical
officer before a Court of Justice. Even under
the Union Government this decree is a danger to the
liberty of the subject. Under an independent Irish
Government, nothing except that vast anti-clerical
revolution which some people foresee could possibly
reassure the people as to the attitude of the Executive
Government in dealing with a large and privileged class.
These considerations make one more reason for refusing
the Colonial analogy which is so ingeniously pressed
by such apologists for Home Rule as Mr. Erskine Childers.
Mr. Amery analyses the confusion of thought between
Home Rule as meaning responsible Government and Home
Rule as meaning separate government which underlies
the arguments of Liberal Home Rulers. Ireland
has Home Rule in the sense of having free representative
institutions. She is prevented by geographical
and economic conditions from enjoying separate government
under the same terms on which the Colonies possess
it. As Mr. Amery points out, the United Kingdom
is geographically a single island group. No part
of Ireland is so inaccessible from the political centre
of British power as the remoter parts of the Highlands,
while racially no less than physically Ireland is
an integral part of the United Kingdom. Economically
also the two countries are bound together in a way