The history of Ireland for the last two centuries and more is a continuous exposition of the disastrous consequences of political and economic separatism within an area where every natural condition, and the whole course of historical development, pointed to political and economic union.  Geographically, racially and historically an integral part of a single homogeneous island group, Ireland has never really been allowed to enjoy the full advantages of political and economic union with the adjoining main island.  Almost every misfortune which Ireland has suffered is directly traceable to this cause.  In spite of this, it is now seriously proposed to subject her once again to the disadvantages of political separation, and that on the very eve of an inevitable change of economic policy, which, while it would restore real vitality and purpose to political union, would also once more intensify all the injury which economic disunion has inflicted upon Ireland in the past.

In the long constitutional struggle of the seventeenth century her position as a separate political unit made Ireland a convenient instrument of Stuart policy against the English Parliament.  Cromwell, with true insight, solved the difficulty by legislative union with England.  But his work was undone at the Restoration, and for another 122 years Ireland remained outside the Union as a separate and subordinate state.  Her economic position was that of a Colony, as Colonies were then administered.  But it was that of a “least favoured Colony.”  This was due, in part, to a real fear of Ireland as a danger to British constitutional liberty and British Protestantism[86] which long survived the occasion which has seemed to justify it.  But what was a more serious and permanent factor was the circumstance that Ireland’s economic development could only be on lines which competed with England, and not like Colonial development on lines complementary to English trade.  One after another Irish industries were penalised and crippled by being forbidden all part in the export trade.  A flourishing woollen industry, a prosperous shipping, promising cotton, silk, glass, glove making and sugar refining industries were all ruthlessly repressed,[87] not from any innate perversity on the part of English statesmen, or from any deliberate desire to ruin Ireland, but as a natural and inevitable consequence of exclusion from the Union under the economic policy of the age.  Whatever outlet Irish economic activity took there was always some English trade whose interests were prejudicially affected, and which promptly exercised a perfectly legitimate pressure upon the Government to put a stop to the competition.  The very poverty of Ireland, as expressed in the lowness of Irish wages, was an ever convenient and perfectly justifiable argument for exclusion.  The linen industry alone received a certain amount of toleration, and even encouragement.  These regulations were so little animated by direct religious or racial antipathy